Maladaptive Rumination Mediates the Relationship between Self-Esteem, Perfectionism, and Work Addiction: A Largescale Survey Study

Abstract

Background: Empirical evidence suggests that low self-esteem and high perfectionism are significant personality correlates of work addiction, but the mechanisms underlying these relationships are still unclear. Consequently, exploring cognitive mechanisms will help to better understand work addiction. For instance, rumination is one of the under-researched topics in work addiction, although it may explain specific thinking processes of work-addicted individuals. The purpose of the study was to test the mediating role of maladaptive rumination (i.e., brooding) in the relationship between personality and addiction. Methods: In a largescale cross-sectional, unrepresentative, online study, 4340 adults with a current job participated. The following psychometric instruments were used: Work Addiction Risk Test Revised, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, and Ruminative Response Scale. Results: It was found that self-oriented perfectionism, socially prescribed perfectionism, and self-esteem had both direct and indirect relationships with work addiction via the mediating effect of maladaptive rumination. The two paths involving brooding explained 44% of the direct relationship. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that brooding type of rumination as a putatively maladaptive strategy explains why individuals characterized by low self-esteem and high perfectionism may have a higher risk of work addiction. The results suggest that cognitive-affective mechanisms in work addiction are similar to those found in other addictive disorders.

Work addiction and personality: A meta-analytic study

“…Such individuals might work more than the others to be more successful and to demonstrate their competence and knowledge in order to obtain more appreciation from important others (e.g., parents, partner, or manager). These associations have been supported by a recent study (i.e., Kun, Magi, et al, 2020;Kun, Urb an, et al, 2020) that emphasized the positive association between socially prescribed perfectionism and work addiction. These findings are in line with other studies examining the motivational background of work addiction (van Beek, Hu, Schaufeli, Taris & Schreurs, 2012;van Beek, Taris & Schaufeli, 2011).…”

Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement

“…We were able to identify a total of 33 independent studies that investigated the factor structure and reliability of the UWES-9 (more details are provided in Supplementary Table 1 1 We carried out this study in Hungary which provided us with a unique context for multiple reasons. First, recent national surveys show that Hungarian people spend a lot of time with work, around 43-44 hours per week (Kun et al, 2020;Urbán et al, 2019). Second, at the same time, Hungarian employees are substantially less engaged with their work when compared to other European countries (Schaufeli, 2018).…”

The Link Between Personal Factors and Workaholism: The Role of Remote Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Skalė matuoja bendrą perfekcionizmą ir atskiras perfekcionizmo dimensijas: į save orientuotą perfekcionizmą, į kitus orientuotą perfekcionizmą ir socialiai priskirtą perfekcionizmą. Kadangi didžiojoje dalyje tyrimų (pavyzdžiui, Falco et al, 2017;Girardi et al, 2018;Kun et al, 2020) patvirtinta, jog atskiri perfekcionizmo komponentai su darboholizmu sąveikauja panašiai kaip bendras perfekcionizmo konstruktas, šiame tyrime atskiros perfekcionizmo dedamosios nebuvo nagrinėtos. Kiekvienas skalės teiginys vertintas 7 balų Likerto skale (kai 1 -"visiškai nesutinku", o 7 -"visiškai sutinku".…”