Malaria parasite detection in thick blood smear microscopic images using modified YOLOV3 and YOLOV4 models

Abstract

Background Manual microscopic examination of Leishman/Giemsa stained thin and thick blood smear is still the “gold standard” for malaria diagnosis. One of the drawbacks of this method is that its accuracy, consistency, and diagnosis speed depend on microscopists’ diagnostic and technical skills. It is difficult to get highly skilled microscopists in remote areas of developing countries. To alleviate this problem, in this paper, we propose to investigate state-of-the-art one-stage and two-stage object detection algorithms for automated malaria parasite screening from microscopic image of thick blood slides. Results YOLOV3 and YOLOV4 models, which are state-of-the-art object detectors in accuracy and speed, are not optimized for detecting small objects such as malaria parasites in microscopic images. We modify these models by increasing feature scale and adding more detection layers to enhance their capability of detecting small objects without notably decreasing detection speed. We propose one modified YOLOV4 model, called YOLOV4-MOD and two modified models of YOLOV3, which are called YOLOV3-MOD1 and YOLOV3-MOD2. Besides, new anchor box sizes are generated using K-means clustering algorithm to exploit the potential of these models in small object detection. The performance of the modified YOLOV3 and YOLOV4 models were evaluated on a publicly available malaria dataset. These models have achieved state-of-the-art accuracy by exceeding performance of their original versions, Faster R-CNN, and SSD in terms of mean average precision (mAP), recall, precision, F1 score, and average IOU. YOLOV4-MOD has achieved the best detection accuracy among all the other models with a mAP of 96.32%. YOLOV3-MOD2 and YOLOV3-MOD1 have achieved mAP of 96.14% and 95.46%, respectively. Conclusions The experimental results of this study demonstrate that performance of modified YOLOV3 and YOLOV4 models are highly promising for detecting malaria parasites from images captured by a smartphone camera over the microscope eyepiece. The proposed system is suitable for deployment in low-resource setting areas.

Artificial Intelligence Model to Detect Real Contact Relationship between Mandibular Third Molars and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Based on Panoramic Radiographs

“…YOLOv4, released in April 2020, is a new high-performance detection network that was developed based on the optimization of the previous convolutional neural network and has been applied in modern medicine [ 26 , 27 ]. YOLOv4 has a faster target detection speed and higher accuracy than other convolutional neural networks and has displayed excellent performance in many applications [ 28 , 29 ]. In YOLOv4, the only required input for the neural network to produce detection results is an image, and complex detection process can be avoided.…”

An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis

“…Rahman et al [30] also exploited TL strategies using both natural and medical images and performed an extensive test of some off-the-shelf CNNs to realise a binary classification. Some other techniques not explored in this work are based on the combination of CNNextracted features and handcrafted ones [31][32][33] or the direct use of object detectors [34]. For example, Kudisthalert et al [33] proposed a malaria parasite detection system, based on the combination of handcrafted and deep features, extracted from pretrained AlexNet.…”

“…Some other techniques not explored in this work are based on the combination of CNN-extracted features and handcrafted ones [ 31 , 32 , 33 ] or the direct use of object detectors [ 34 ]. For example, Kudisthalert et al [ 33 ] proposed a malaria parasite detection system, based on the combination of handcrafted and deep features, extracted from pretrained AlexNet.…”

Diagnosing Malaria Patients with Plasmodium falciparum and vivax Using Deep Learning for Thick Smear Images

“…In 2021, Abdurahman et al [28] modified YOLOV3 and YOLOV4 to handle small object detections. They tested their modified network on 1182 images from patients infected by P. falciparum parasites.…”