2002
DOI: 10.1525/sp.2002.49.2.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male Advantage and the Gender Composition of Jobs: Who Rides the Glass Escalator?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
237
4
15

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
16
237
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…en resultados no mostrados, se rechaza que la brecha salarial de género (nivel 1) varíe según el grado de feminización (nivel 2) 21 . Así, se descarta la teoría de la «escalera de vidrio» (Budig, 2002) que indica que hombres en ocupaciones feminizadas logran sortear parte de las penalidades de la composición de género, aprovechándose de ventajas estructurales no directamente observables (Cohen y Huffman, 2003). De este modo, tanto en titulados hombres como mujeres existe una pérdida de remuneraciones por encontrarse en una carrera feminizada, manteniéndose la brecha salarial de género.…”
Section: Análisis De Regresiónunclassified
“…en resultados no mostrados, se rechaza que la brecha salarial de género (nivel 1) varíe según el grado de feminización (nivel 2) 21 . Así, se descarta la teoría de la «escalera de vidrio» (Budig, 2002) que indica que hombres en ocupaciones feminizadas logran sortear parte de las penalidades de la composición de género, aprovechándose de ventajas estructurales no directamente observables (Cohen y Huffman, 2003). De este modo, tanto en titulados hombres como mujeres existe una pérdida de remuneraciones por encontrarse en una carrera feminizada, manteniéndose la brecha salarial de género.…”
Section: Análisis De Regresiónunclassified
“…According to Acker (2006), the process of delineating specific work requirements and job responsibilities lend organizations to search for the ideal worker-an individual glamorized as unencumbered by outside family obligations and solely dedicated to the organization-who is generally presumed to be a man. Budig (2002) found that while outside obligations such as marriage and family have a negative impact on female wages, the reverse is true for male wages. Budig (2002) theorized that these responsibilities are perceived as distractions for women but as commitments that increase occupational dedication for men due to social pressures on males to serve as providers.…”
Section: Gender and Occupationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Budig (2002) found that while outside obligations such as marriage and family have a negative impact on female wages, the reverse is true for male wages. Budig (2002) theorized that these responsibilities are perceived as distractions for women but as commitments that increase occupational dedication for men due to social pressures on males to serve as providers. Changing the gendered nature of organizations would be extremely difficult, Acker (1990) argued, due to the long history of systemic gender bias that has been embedded in organizational structure.…”
Section: Gender and Occupationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations