1940
DOI: 10.2307/2084435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male and Female Broken Home Rates by Types of Delinquency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of presentation is suggested by the literature. A number of investigators (Nye, 1958;Weeks, 1940;Toby, 1957;Gibbons and Griswold, 1957;Wilkinson, 1974) have found the effects of family relationships were stronger for girls than for boys, and our data indicate important differences in the patterns of relationships between boys and girls. Relationships broken down by sex of parent (respondent) will not be presented in detail because in most instances this variable had no effect on the results.…”
Section: The Studysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This type of presentation is suggested by the literature. A number of investigators (Nye, 1958;Weeks, 1940;Toby, 1957;Gibbons and Griswold, 1957;Wilkinson, 1974) have found the effects of family relationships were stronger for girls than for boys, and our data indicate important differences in the patterns of relationships between boys and girls. Relationships broken down by sex of parent (respondent) will not be presented in detail because in most instances this variable had no effect on the results.…”
Section: The Studysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…22, 27 A number of studies have reported an association between broken homes and delinquency,21 • 22 . 3o and there is evidence that this association is stronger for female than for male delinquents.8• 1s, 25,26 The data suggest that it is not the actual break-up of the home that promotes delinquency, but the family discord and disharmony that precede the break. 22 The mechanisms by which marital or family disharmony result in increased rates of delinquency are not well understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because underadjustment bias is often coupled with a selection of samples where obvious and large nonequivalences exist on a wide range of variables. "Known delinquents" are singled out and compared with the nonincarcerated, nonapprehended general adolescent population so that a priori differences are maximizedl (Glueck and Glueck, 1934;Newman and Denman, 1970-197 1;Jaffe, 1969;Monahan, 1957;Weeks, 1940;Shaw and McKay, 1932;Lumpkin, 1932). For example, Chilton and Markle (1972: 94) conclude "that the living arrangements of children ten to seventeen years old in the U.S. population distribute quite differently from those of children in Florida charged with offenses which would be crimes if committed by adults.,' Given the original disparities between these groups, large statistical adjustments are clearly necessary to isolate the effect of broken homes.…”
Section: Methodological Issues In the Study Of Broken Homesmentioning
confidence: 99%