1996
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199601270-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant Melanoma in Organ Allograft Recipients1,2

Abstract: Three groups of tumors were studied. The first group was melanomas inadvertently transmitted from donors. Brain metastases from melanoma were often misdiagnosed in the donors as primary brain tumors or cerebral hemorrhage. Eleven donors provided organs to 20 recipients of whom 3 never manifested evidence of melanoma, 1 showed local spread of tumor beyond the allograft, and 16 had metastases. Of the last group 11 died from melanoma, but 4 patients had complete remissions following transplant nephrectomy and dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
221
1
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
221
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-term use of current immunosuppression has multiple deleterious side effects, including direct nephrotoxicity leading to renal failure, increased susceptibility for infections, and increased frequency of cutaneous and hematological malignancies. 5,6 These clinical problems have prompted efforts to develop novel strategies for achieving long-term allograft function and survival without life-long immunosuppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term use of current immunosuppression has multiple deleterious side effects, including direct nephrotoxicity leading to renal failure, increased susceptibility for infections, and increased frequency of cutaneous and hematological malignancies. 5,6 These clinical problems have prompted efforts to develop novel strategies for achieving long-term allograft function and survival without life-long immunosuppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is much more difficult to address cancer immunosurveillance in humans, three lines of evidence suggest that cancer immunosurveillance indeed occurs in humans: (i) immunosuppressed transplant recipients display higher incidences of non-viral tumors, such as melanomas, colon, lung, pancreas, bladder, kidney, and endocrine system cancers, than agematched immunocompetent control populations, 12) (ii) the presence of lymphocytes within the tumor can be a positive prognostic indicator of patient survival, 13) and (iii) cancer patients are able to develop spontaneous innate and acquired immune responses to the tumors that they bear 14,15) (also reviewed elsewhere 16,17) ). The analysis of immune responses of cancer patients against the tumor that they bear has led to the identification of a large array of immunogenic tumor antigens recognized by CD8…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies have reported no deaths due to melanoma in cases of malignant melanoma in situ or thin superficial spreading melanoma in the organ transplant recipients. 29,34,44,52 In a recent European multicenter retrospective study of 100 melanomas (91 occurred 25 ); others have not found a significant difference. 6 Other factors found to correlate with increased risk of melanoma included use of T lymphocyte-depleting antibodies and excessive UV radiation exposure.…”
Section: Clinical Course Of Melanoma In Solid Organ Transplant Recipimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,25,47 De novo melanomas tend to develop 3 years posttransplant or later, 40 with reports ranging from 14 to 236 months. 29 The mean time for melanoma development in the OTR population is 61 months posttransplant, 44 with some studies documenting a range of 40 to 132 months. 29,34,52 In the general population, key prognostic factors that determine the stage of disease include Breslow thickness, Clark level, ulceration, lymph node involvement, number of mitoses, and distant metastasis.…”
Section: Clinical Course Of Melanoma In Solid Organ Transplant Recipimentioning
confidence: 99%