2013
DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.883919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant papillary glioneuronal tumor of the pineal gland: Case presentation and literature review of a distinct entity

Abstract: Patient:Male, 58Final Diagnosis:Papillary glioneuronal tumor of the pineal glandSymptoms:Headache • loss of memory • hydrocephalusMedication:—Clinical Procedure:—Specialty:Oncology • neurology • neurosurgeryObjective:Rare diseaseBackground:The authors report the third case of a rare papillary glioneuronal tumor of the pineal gland and only the second case reported with anaplastic features in this particular location. The authors also review the literature of papillary glioneuronal tumors.Case Report:Our patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment options that include surgical resection extent, radiation therapy and chemotherapy are varied and unstandardized. Moreover, the results of each treatment are too heterogeneous and it is impossible to assume the OS or PFS ( Table 3 ) 1 2 4 8 13 16 19 21 22) . Although those tumors generally have a more favorable prognosis than glioblastomas 22) , the present median OS of 21.2 months and PFS of 6.3 months of patients with the pathological diagnosis were not so favorable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment options that include surgical resection extent, radiation therapy and chemotherapy are varied and unstandardized. Moreover, the results of each treatment are too heterogeneous and it is impossible to assume the OS or PFS ( Table 3 ) 1 2 4 8 13 16 19 21 22) . Although those tumors generally have a more favorable prognosis than glioblastomas 22) , the present median OS of 21.2 months and PFS of 6.3 months of patients with the pathological diagnosis were not so favorable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%