2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03322-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia: a follow-up study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c If a patient has other sites of oral leukoplakia in addition to tongue, the patient will be categorized as "yes" malignant changes of OLK, similar conflict between the published reports was also found; oral habits were significant factors in some academic works [5,29,39] and non-significant in others [21,38,[40][41][42]. In the present study, oral habits were not factors related to the recurrence or malignant transformation of oral tongue leukoplakia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…c If a patient has other sites of oral leukoplakia in addition to tongue, the patient will be categorized as "yes" malignant changes of OLK, similar conflict between the published reports was also found; oral habits were significant factors in some academic works [5,29,39] and non-significant in others [21,38,[40][41][42]. In the present study, oral habits were not factors related to the recurrence or malignant transformation of oral tongue leukoplakia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, a study by Rubert et al provides us with information that gender may also influence the risk of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia. In the study, 57.1% of cases were diagnosed among female patients and 42.9% among male patients, which may lead to a conclusion that female patients might be more prone to malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia [ 29 ], which is the opposite result of the research conducted by Jayasooriya et al [ 28 ], Wang et al [ 27 ], and meta-analysis prepared by Matulić et al, which also revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia between male and female patients [ 30 ]. Nevertheless, returning to the statement that the age of patients may influence the clinical symptoms of leukoplakia, the study by Rupert et al also seems to confirm this [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Jayasooriya et al, similarly to our results, also found men to be more affected by leukoplakia: in a group of 93 cases of leukoplakia, men predominated with a ratio of men to women of 3.5: 1.That being said, this study revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia connected with gender. In this study the age of patients also did not influence the risk of malignant transformation [ 28 ]. On the other hand, in retrospective research conducted by Rubert et al, in a group of 412 patients diagnosed with oral leukoplakia, females (281) predominated over males (131) [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1,2 Oral leukoplakia (OLK) is the most prevalent OPMDs recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO). 3,4 Based on observational 24 studies, Warnakulasuriya et al 5,6 estimated OLK overall (mean) malignant transformation rate to 3.5% (405/11423), and the malignant transformation may range from 0.13% to 34.0% increasing with the degree of epithelial dysplasia. [7][8][9] The mechanism of OLK progression remains unclear, which seriously affects clinical treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%