Malnutrition in women with rheumatoid arthritis is not revealed by clinical anthropometrical measurements or nutritional evaluation tools

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate diagnostic instruments for assessment of nutritional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in relation to objective body composition data. Subjects and methods: Study subjects include 60 in-ward patients (83% women, median age 65 years). Anthropometric measures and the nutritional tools Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and Nutritional Risk Screening tool 2002 (NRS-2002. Body composition was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and fat-free mass index (FFMI; kg/m 2 ) and fat mass index (FMI; kg/m 2 ) were calculated. Results: Mean body mass index (BMI) for RA women and men were 24.4 and 26.9 kg/m 2 , respectively. Twelve per cent of the women and none of the few men had BMIo18.5 kg/m 2 , that is, the cutoff value for malnutrition. FFMI indicated 52% of the women and 30% of the men to be malnourished. The sensitivity and specificity for BMI to detect malnutrition according to FFMI were 27 and 100%, whereas for arm muscle circumference the sensitivity was 36% and the specificity 89% and for triceps skin fold 43 and 93%, respectively. For MNA, sensitivity was 85% and specificity 39% and for SGA 46 and 82%. Both MUST and NRS-2002 had sensitivity of 45% and specificity of 19%. Conclusion: A large proportion of in-ward RA patients had reduced FFMI. Concurrent elevation of fat mass made BMI a nonreliable tool to detect malnutrition. Of the tested clinical evaluation tools, MNA might be used as a screening instrument, but because of its low specificity it should be followed by body composition determination.

Making the invisible visible: bioelectrical impedance analysis demonstrates unfavourable body composition in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice

“…Low FFMI may affect their quality of life by causing decreased muscle strength, altered energy metabolism, and depressed immune function (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Increased FM and obesity may increase the risk of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (3,7,(9)(10)(11).…”

Is Serum Albumin a Marker of Malnutrition in Chronic Disease? The Scleroderma Paradigm

“…The many tools that have been developed to assess nutritional status are uncertain in their validity and reliability and vary in ease of use and acceptability [40][41][42][43]. There are multiple screening tools in use [20,21,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], but one must differentiate the concept of a screening tool from the actual diagnosis of …”

Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA®-SF): A practical tool for identification of nutritional status

“…Of these 2032 participants, 1346 were living in nursing homes, 490 in the community, 127 in hospitals and 65 in geriatric rehabilitation facilities. These twelve datasets were from Germany (13,14,15,16), Sweden (17,18), Spain (19), Italy (20), The Netherlands (21), Australia (22), Japan (23), and South Africa (24). Table 2 presents the highest ranking coefficients for the possible revised MNA-SF compared to the full MNA using sensitivity as the primary ranking criterion.…”