“…With the conversion included in the original Stanford tools, 4 the Penn Treebank (Marcus et al 1993) and indeed any treebank annotated in the Penn Treebank constituency scheme can be converted into the SD scheme. In addition, the SD scheme is especially popular in parser evaluation works (Cer et al 2010;Nivre et al 2010;Clegg and Shepherd 2007;Miwa et al 2010;Foster et al 2011), and several parsers are capable of producing the scheme either natively or by conversion, including the Charniak-Johnson parser (Charniak and Johnson 2005), the Stanford parser (Klein and Manning 2003), the Clear parser Choi and Palmer (2011), the parser of Tratz and Hovy (2011), and naturally any dependency parser that can be trained from a treebank, such as the MaltParser (Nivre et al 2007), the MSTParser (McDonald et al 2006) or the MateTools parser (Bohnet 2010). The scheme was originally intended to be applicationoriented, and it has indeed been successfully used in applications, particularly in the biomedical domain (Björne et al 2010;Miyao et al 2009;Qian and Zhou 2012), and otherwise in opinion extraction (Zhuang et al 2006) and sentiment analysis (Meena and Prabhakar 2007).…”