2020 15th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST) 2020
DOI: 10.23919/icitst51030.2020.9351333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malware Detection by Eating a Whole APK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They used a CNN model, which has a precision of 98.3%, to classify malware without relying on any special features. In [ 22 , 24 , 41 , 42 ] CNN and TCN models were used to classify malware with texture features. The proposed deep learning models directly collect the malware images for classification without selecting the special features using descriptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used a CNN model, which has a precision of 98.3%, to classify malware without relying on any special features. In [ 22 , 24 , 41 , 42 ] CNN and TCN models were used to classify malware with texture features. The proposed deep learning models directly collect the malware images for classification without selecting the special features using descriptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, significant research has been conducted on CNN-based image processing of Android code and the subsequent analysis [42], and most studies involving sequence formats used significantly common features. In this study, we used migration learning to migrate the source code comments to the original uncommented malicious Android code.…”
Section: Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Fawa'reh et al [25] introduced a convolutional neural-network-based approach for malware detection using hacked Android package files (APKs). By leveraging different sets of balanced and unbalanced datasets from those created by [24], the authors showed that their method was highly accurate at detecting malware, with an overall accuracy of 96.4%.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model was compared with those of recent studies [24][25][26]. The previous experiments used the same dataset with the different models listed in Table 13.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Same Dataset With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%