2015
DOI: 10.1515/pr-2015-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Mama Zimbi, pls help me!” – Gender differences in (im)politeness in Ghanaian English advice-giving on Facebook

Abstract: This paper explores (im)politeness and gender in a specific advicegiving practice of young Ghanaians online. The data is collected from the Facebook fan page of Mama Zimbi, a radio and TV personality from Ghana, and consists of a sample of 400 messages in response to two male and two female advice-seekers' problem messages. The messages are analyzed according to form-and content-based categories, focussing on the directness and content of advice, the content of discursive moves other than advice, and address t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This period saw further theoretical debate on the basis of empirical findings Grainger et al 2015;Hampel 2015;Johns and Félix-Brasdefer 2015;Lauriks et al 2015;Makoni 2015). These latter two special issues have arisen out of the need to expanding politeness research to other geographical areas (also see Brown 2010Brown , 2013Kádár and Mills 2013;Hatfield and Hahn 2014;Peterson and Vaattovaara 2014) and to further investigating politeness in non-verbal forms, such as the complex relationship between prosody and politeness.…”
Section: -2015: Further Growth and Maturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This period saw further theoretical debate on the basis of empirical findings Grainger et al 2015;Hampel 2015;Johns and Félix-Brasdefer 2015;Lauriks et al 2015;Makoni 2015). These latter two special issues have arisen out of the need to expanding politeness research to other geographical areas (also see Brown 2010Brown , 2013Kádár and Mills 2013;Hatfield and Hahn 2014;Peterson and Vaattovaara 2014) and to further investigating politeness in non-verbal forms, such as the complex relationship between prosody and politeness.…”
Section: -2015: Further Growth and Maturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, research on advice is diverse covering advice-seeking (Ortega et al, 2020), advice-giving (Bjørkdahl & Druglitrø, 2018), and reception to advice (Duan et al, 2018;Van Swol et al, 2019). Past research on advice has also examined various factors affecting these advice-related practices such as the relationship between advice and politeness (Goldsmith & MacGeorge, 2000), gender (Hampel, 2015), topics of discussion (Locher, 2006), culture (Morrow, 2012), contexts (Limberg & Locher, 2012), and characteristics of interlocutors (Gaertig & Simmons, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, despite advice being a much researched area as mentioned, studies that relate advice strategies to culture are fairly limited. These studies focused predominantly on the European (Chentsova-Dutton & Vaughn, 2012), American (Glide, 2015), Asian (Morrow, 2012), and the African (Hampel, 2015) regions. Similarly, cross-cultural comparison studies on advice strategies also centered on only a few cultures, for instance comparing the Russian and American cultures (Chentsova-Dutton & Vaughn, 2012), the American and Chinese cultures (Feng, 2015;Feng & Feng, 2011), and the East Asian and the Euro-Canadian cultures (Ji et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, whilst Hampel (2015 , p. 104) argues that “individuals’ perceptions of appropriate or polite behavior also play a vital role since differing expectations and interpretations of (im)politeness may lead to conflicts”, Haugh (2013 , p. 58) emphasizes that “the evaluation is one way to study impoliteness”, since, “impoliteness occurs not so much when the speaker produces behavior but rather when the hearer evaluates that behavior.” With this in mind, a thorough metapragmatic examination of each corpus is carried out so as to determine users’ own evaluation of the ongoing flow of interventions within the comment threads (see subsection 4.1).…”
Section: Overview Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%