2009
DOI: 10.4261/1305-3825.dir.2733-09.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammographic features and approach to the sternalis muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are agree with Demirpolat et al (15) that the sternalis muscle should be classified as BI-RADS category II and investigation beyond mammography and US is not indicated when an opacity resembling the sternalis muscle is seen. However, CT or MRI may be performed when there is any doubt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 38%
“…We are agree with Demirpolat et al (15) that the sternalis muscle should be classified as BI-RADS category II and investigation beyond mammography and US is not indicated when an opacity resembling the sternalis muscle is seen. However, CT or MRI may be performed when there is any doubt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 38%
“…In one such study, the authors found no cases of the sternalis muscle from a review of medical records of 1,580 women who had undergone mammographic imaging, compared with three confirmed cases out of 75 cadavers (4.0%) they examined (Saeed et al, ). Demirpolat et al () reviewed 10 years' worth of records from the mammography unit and reported only 10 cases among 52,930 female patients (0.018%). Bradley et al () evaluated 32,000 women who had received craniocaudal projection mammography screening and reported only four cases of the sternalis muscle (0.0001%).…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is often described as a “rare” variant [ 6 , 7 ], the appearance of M sternalis was documented as early as the 17th century [ 14 ], and its identification as a known anatomic variant is common through the early 20th century [ 10 , 13 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], after which it tends to appear only chiefly in case reports of unusual anatomic features. This may be because M sternalis appears to be of little clinical significance except for those who might encounter it in medical imaging or surgical professions [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modern times, M sternalis may be encountered in thoracic surgery or in diagnostic imaging, such as mammography [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], which may account for a slightly higher reported prevalence for this muscle in females than in males. However, most reports of this anatomic variant arise from serendipitous findings, like the one in our teaching lab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%