2016
DOI: 10.21003/ea.v158-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management and art-management: dimensions of conceptual interaction

Abstract: The article deals with new aspects of evolution of management as a science and technology. The authors give the assessment of the opinion about the existence of a crisis in the theory and practice of management. It is claimed that the crisis is caused by the objective course of development of science in the 21 st century, which shows unrealised possibilities of the management theory. It has been proved that the emergence of art-management in the third millennium produces considerable consequences and contribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The artist's organisational activity may concern three dimensions: 1) selfmanagement (Jones, 2009;Kostera, 2014;Marra, 2019;Sims, 2003;Szostak and Sułkowski, 2021a), 2) managing the aesthetic situation (Böhme, 2021;Gołaszewska, 1984b;Szostak, 2021;Szostak and Sułkowski, 2020), 3) managing a cultural institution, if an artist with managerial skills was employed for this purpose (Morozova et al, 2016;Rius-Ulldemolins and Klein, 2021). Therefore, considerations regarding managerial issues in the artist's activity can be placed on self-organisation and self-management, where self-awareness and the ability to reflect are essential.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artist's organisational activity may concern three dimensions: 1) selfmanagement (Jones, 2009;Kostera, 2014;Marra, 2019;Sims, 2003;Szostak and Sułkowski, 2021a), 2) managing the aesthetic situation (Böhme, 2021;Gołaszewska, 1984b;Szostak, 2021;Szostak and Sułkowski, 2020), 3) managing a cultural institution, if an artist with managerial skills was employed for this purpose (Morozova et al, 2016;Rius-Ulldemolins and Klein, 2021). Therefore, considerations regarding managerial issues in the artist's activity can be placed on self-organisation and self-management, where self-awareness and the ability to reflect are essential.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual arts management may be considered on three levels: 1) self-management of the visual arts creator (Jones, 2009;Kostera, 2014;Marra, 2019;Sims, 2003;Szostak & Sułkowski, 2021b); 2) management of the aesthetic situation by the visual arts creator (Böhme, 2021;Szostak, 2021;Szostak & Sułkowski, 2020); 3) visual arts institution management by a visual arts creator (Morozova et al, 2016;Rius-Ulldemolins & Klein, 2021). Each of these levels is characterised by different complications; however, they also have common denominators based on considering the metaphysical nature of the essence of the aesthetic situation (Szostak, 2021).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The professional culture of a specialist is a combination of special knowledge and experience of their implementation in professional activities. Special requirements are now being set for the training of specialists in the field of management -managers, as the most active subjects of a market economy (Morozova et al, 2016), who are able to actively to the current conditions, leaders with strategic thinking and professional image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%