Management and Outcomes of Paediatric Intracranial Suppurations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

Abstract

Introduction: Intracranial suppurations account for a significant proportion of intracranial masses in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly among children. The development of better imaging equipment, antibiotics, and surgical techniques has enabled significant progress in detecting and treating intracranial abscesses. However, it is unclear whether these advances are accessible and utilised by LMICs. In this review, we aimed to describe the landscape of paediatric intracranial suppurations in LMICs.Methods: This scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. MEDLINE, EMBASE, WHO Global Index Medicus, AJOL and Google scholar were searched for relevant articles from database inception to January 18th, 2021. Publications in English and French were included.Results: Of the 1,011 records identified, 75 were included. The studies, on average, included 18.8 (95% CI = 8.4–29.1) children (mean age: 8.2 years). Most children were male (62.2%, 95% CI = 28.7–95.7%). Intracranial suppurations were most commonly (46.5%) located in the supratentorial brain parenchyma. The most prevalent causative mechanism was otitis (37.4%) with streptococcus species being the most common causative organism (19.4%). CT scan (71.2%) was most commonly used as a diagnostic tool and antibiotics were given to all patients. Symptoms resolved in 23.7% and improved in 15.3% of patients. The morbidity rate was 6.9%, 18.8% of patients were readmitted, and the mortality rate was 11.0%.Conclusion: Most intracranial suppurations were complications of preventable infections and despite MRI being the gold standard for detecting intracranial suppurations, CT scans were mostly used in LMICs. These differences are likely a consequence of inequities in healthcare and have resulted in a high mortality rate in LMICs.

Management and outcomes of intracranial fungal infections in children and adults in Africa: a scoping review protocol

“…The screening process of this proposed scoping review will comprise two phases. In the first phase, a calibration exercise will be carried out before title and abstract screening in order to ensure an adequate understanding of the inclusion criteria by study screeners 19–21. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed by two independent reviewers following broad inclusion criteria, that is, studies looking at the management and outcomes of IcFIs in Africa.…”

“…In the first phase, a calibration exercise will be carried out before title and abstract screening in order to ensure an adequate understanding of the inclusion criteria by study screeners. [19][20][21] Titles and abstracts will be reviewed by two independent reviewers following broad inclusion criteria, that is, studies looking at the management and outcomes of IcFIs in Africa. Papers identified by either or both reviewers will be included in the next phase, which is the full-text screening.…”

Current state of management and outcomes of facial nerve palsy in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol

“…First, a calibration exercise will be carried out before title and abstract screening in order to ensure an adequate understanding of the inclusion criteria by the study screeners. [25][26][27] All the articles resulting from the search will be exported in Rayyan, 28 to facilitate deduplication and independent, blinded screening. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the identified articles based on the predefined eligibility inclusion criteria, that is, studies looking at the management and outcomes of facial nerve palsies in LMICs.…”

The Neurology and Neurosurgery Interest Group (NANSIG)—ten years of cultivating interest in clinical neurosciences

“…This programme provides students and junior doctors with the opportunity to design and lead global neurosurgical research projects within a topic of their interest, under the mentorship of experienced academics. Though in its infancy, the collaborative has since contributed to the scholarly output in Africa through identifying areas in need of improvement, such as the lack of availability and accessibility of diagnostic and management tools for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the continent [ 12 , 13 , 35 ].…”