2003
DOI: 10.1108/01435120310464853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management and the management of information, knowledge‐based and library services 2002

Abstract: Reviews the general literature of management relevant to the information and library professions, and that of the management of information, knowledge‐based and library services published in 2002. Themes emerging at major conferences are noted and issues of growing concern are identified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 211 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the method through which a library can focus on a relatively small number of “carefully” chosen measurements that are aligned with its mission and strategies, and they provide a quick but comprehensive picture of library performance, is the balance scorecard approach (Self, 2004). Performance measurement approaches of academic libraries (Kyrillidou and Blixrud, 1999; Wilson et al , 2000; Blixrud, 2001; Eustace, 2003; Layzell Ward, 2003: Ryan, 2007) include, among others the ISO 11620:1998 and ISO 2789:2003, the IFLA handbooks and the directives[3] by IFLA, ARL, ACRL, the academic libraries in Australia and in Great Britain, as well as national evaluation frameworks (see Poll, 2008) and the European projects and programmes[4] In Greece MOPAB[5] provides performance measurement indicators for the academic libraries.…”
Section: Approaches To Managing Quality In Academic Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the method through which a library can focus on a relatively small number of “carefully” chosen measurements that are aligned with its mission and strategies, and they provide a quick but comprehensive picture of library performance, is the balance scorecard approach (Self, 2004). Performance measurement approaches of academic libraries (Kyrillidou and Blixrud, 1999; Wilson et al , 2000; Blixrud, 2001; Eustace, 2003; Layzell Ward, 2003: Ryan, 2007) include, among others the ISO 11620:1998 and ISO 2789:2003, the IFLA handbooks and the directives[3] by IFLA, ARL, ACRL, the academic libraries in Australia and in Great Britain, as well as national evaluation frameworks (see Poll, 2008) and the European projects and programmes[4] In Greece MOPAB[5] provides performance measurement indicators for the academic libraries.…”
Section: Approaches To Managing Quality In Academic Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 202 useable surveys were collected with 48 rejections, which gave a response rate of 80 per cent. 20) , Garbutt (1996), Shutler and Gawford (1998), Deiry and Philips (1998), Peter (1999), Johnson andGolomski (1999), Gatfield (1999), Hasan and Shariff (2000), McAdam and Welsh (2000), Brennan (2001, Srikanth and Dairymble (2003), Ward (2003), Stella (2004), Lomes (2004), Sakthivel et al (2005), Emiliani (2005), Temponi (2006), Mizikaci (2006), Thakkar et al (2006). 36.…”
Section: The Variables Measures and Inquiry Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40. Top management commitment (Leadership)( 17) Zairi (1995), , Teare (1998), Johnson and Golomski (1999), Wella (1999), MBNQA (1999), Hwarng (2000), McAdam and Welsh (2000), Avdjieva and Wilson (2002), Ward (2003), Lomes (2004), Shirvani (2004), Sakthivel et al (2005), Emiliani (2005), Konidari and Abernot (2006), Temponi (2006). 41.…”
Section: The Variables Measures and Inquiry Processmentioning
confidence: 99%