2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management commitment to safety as organizational support: Relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manufacturing employees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
104
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
14
104
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings of Michael et al (2005) are consistent with the organizational support theory. In accordance with the said theory, timework employees consider organization's commitment for safety as a kind of perceived organizational support, and the throughputs of the foregoing is similar to that of the perceived organizational support (POS).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Findings of Michael et al (2005) are consistent with the organizational support theory. In accordance with the said theory, timework employees consider organization's commitment for safety as a kind of perceived organizational support, and the throughputs of the foregoing is similar to that of the perceived organizational support (POS).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, commitment to safety has also a negative relationship with employee withdrawal behaviors (Michael et al, 2005). Ongoing attendance to safety results in organizational rewards, in turn increase employee motivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…employee attitudes etc) (Miller and Murphy, 2006). Michael et al (2005) suggest that employee perceptions of management's concern for employee well-being through a dedication to safety may result in positive outcomes beyond improved safety performance. Perceived management commitment to safety has been linked to employee attitudes such as: job satisfaction, organisational commitment and turnover (Michael et al, 2005;Zanko and Dawson, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michael et al (2005) suggest that employee perceptions of management's concern for employee well-being through a dedication to safety may result in positive outcomes beyond improved safety performance. Perceived management commitment to safety has been linked to employee attitudes such as: job satisfaction, organisational commitment and turnover (Michael et al, 2005;Zanko and Dawson, 2012). A meta-analysis by Faragher et al (2005) found evidence that job satisfaction was associated with workers' mental health but the evidence for a link with subjective physical health was weaker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous scholars have argued that work accidents, injuries, and bad working conditions result in decreased employee morale, organizational commitment and job satisfaction (Michael et al, 2005). Therefore, as the adoption of environmental-related standards improves the health and safety conditions of employees by mitigating pollution, reducing contact with hazardous materials and diminishing bad odors and noise, one may expect these standards to generate positive effects on the workers' reported perception of being equitably recognized.…”
Section: Environmental-related Standards and Employees' Attitudes Andmentioning
confidence: 99%