2001
DOI: 10.5465/ame.2001.5898744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management fads: Emergence, evolution, and implications for managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transformational leader encourages subordinates to make effort in order to follow organizational goals and selfactualization (Bass, 1985;Gibson & Tesone, 2001). Transformational leaders create modern growth path through presenting new ideas and criterions.…”
Section: Transformational Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformational leader encourages subordinates to make effort in order to follow organizational goals and selfactualization (Bass, 1985;Gibson & Tesone, 2001). Transformational leaders create modern growth path through presenting new ideas and criterions.…”
Section: Transformational Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination highlights an emerging field that links the two (2) concepts. Such growth rejects the typical pattern of a management 'fad' or 'fashion' (Fink, 2003: 54;Gibson and Tesone, 2001;Gibson et al, 2003;Kennedy, 2004), which Abrahamson (1996: 256) describes as a rapid, bell-shaped swing. The tenacity and resilience of the concept(s) over time and the emergence of the combination provides the support for the study, in the sense it would be worth establishing more congruence about its meaning.…”
Section: Value and Longevity Of The Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fads persist for periods that are contemporaneous with executive tenure, and adherence to them can lend an executive the veneer of high performance (e.g. Gibson & Tesone 2001). The learning journey of the firm regarding the advisability of the fad typically lasts longer than the tenure of many executives, allowing them to be paid for the execution of a bad and -by virtue of being a fad -uncompetitive idea.…”
Section: Learning Paradoxes In the Executive Pay Debatementioning
confidence: 99%