2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of hydrosalpinx before or during in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: a national postal survey in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…En l'absence de plissement muqueux persistant, il existe des raisons de penser que le caractère non fonctionnel de la trompe est définitif quel que soit le résultat anatomique du traitement de l'obstruction distale. Toutefois, bien que des recommandations officielles existent concernant la prise en charge des hydrosalpinx [ 39 ], il est regrettable d'observer que moins de la moitié des centres pratiquant la FIV les appliquent [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En l'absence de plissement muqueux persistant, il existe des raisons de penser que le caractère non fonctionnel de la trompe est définitif quel que soit le résultat anatomique du traitement de l'obstruction distale. Toutefois, bien que des recommandations officielles existent concernant la prise en charge des hydrosalpinx [ 39 ], il est regrettable d'observer que moins de la moitié des centres pratiquant la FIV les appliquent [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Indeed, surgical treatment of hydrosalpinges is recommended prior to IVF, especially when hydrosalpinges are visible on ultrasound [10], but salpingectomy should be only bilateral if the hydrosalpinges are bilateral [11]. To improve pregnancy rates in patients with hydrosalpinges without risking a decrease in ovarian response, alternatives to salpingectomy were proposed, such as neosalpingostomy and proximal tubal occlusion, yielding similar IVF outcomes [11,19,24]. Many studies have attributed the decrease in ovarian response after salpingectomy to surgical damage to the ovarian blood supply in the mesosalpinx [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the most popular treatment option of clinicians, surgical intervention, such as laparoscopy/salpingectomy, laparotomy/salpingectomy, proximal occlusion, and distal salpingostomy, has been demonstrated to be effective on improving the rates of implantation and pregnancy, and reducing the rate of ectopic pregnancy and abortion . Among these procedures, laparoscopic salpingectomy accounts for about 70% of surgical interventions with the disadvantages of reduced ovarian responsiveness, and an increased surgical risk for patients with severe pelvic adhesions . Moreover, surgery inevitably increases the burden of costs and worries on patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,10,11 Among these procedures, laparoscopic salpingectomy accounts for about 70% of surgical interventions with the disadvantages of reduced ovarian responsiveness, and an increased surgical risk for patients with severe pelvic adhesions. 20 Moreover, surgery inevitably increases the burden of costs and Data are presented as mean ± SD or as a percentage of the total number. EM, endometrial thickness; Gn, gonadotropin; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%