2018
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy238
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of left main disease: an update

Abstract: A severe narrowing of the left main coronary artery (LMCA), usually due to atherosclerosis, jeopardizes a large area of myocardium and increases the risk of major adverse cardiac events. Management strategies for LMCA disease include coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In general, PCI offers more rapid recovery and a lower early adverse event rate, whereas CABG offers a more durable procedure. The largest of six LMCA trials comparing PCI with CABG recently repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several randomized and large observational studies are ongoing to further clarify the safety and efficacy of LMCA intervention. 26…”
Section: Trial Evidence For Lm Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several randomized and large observational studies are ongoing to further clarify the safety and efficacy of LMCA intervention. 26…”
Section: Trial Evidence For Lm Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two larger studies that specifically evaluated revascularization strategies for LMCA disease were the EXCEL 16 and the NOBLE trials 28 (Table 2). Even the most recent revascularization guidelines, published by the ESC in 2018, 22 , were made without the availability of the long-term results of these studies, 29,30 but it gave a class recommendation for PCI in patients with low complexity LMCA disease, and maintained class IIA indication for moderate complexity anatomies.…”
Section: Clinical Trials and Guidelines Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, left main (LM) PCI is considered a high-risk procedure because this artery supplies blood to a large area of the myocardium. 2 Therefore, given the technical complexity of LM PCI, which may require use of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter or a twostent strategy, operators often select transfemoral assess (TFA) for its broader support options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%