2014
DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2014.911835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy

Abstract: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are common and may greatly affect a patient's quality of life. There is very little information regarding optimum management in future pregnancies. Based upon anecdotal experience, this study describes the recommendations of a cohort of consultant obstetricians in the UK, in this clinical situation. There is limited adherence to the available national guidelines due to the absence of available equipment and expertise to perform endo-anal ultrasound and manometry. Elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of this particular set of criteria, however, left a relatively large number of “equivocal” cases in which decision-making was once again, and by admission of the authors, left to a variety of assessment methods that are neither validated nor consistent. The uncertainty regarding management for this group of women was evident in a paper reporting the recommendations for mode of subsequent delivery from a large UK survey [ 19 ]. Although clinical judgement and patient-centred care are always imperative, one of the strengths of our study is that it is the largest study to date to report the outcomes of using a protocol to aid clinicians in recommending mode of subsequent delivery that leaves no “equivocal” group of women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of this particular set of criteria, however, left a relatively large number of “equivocal” cases in which decision-making was once again, and by admission of the authors, left to a variety of assessment methods that are neither validated nor consistent. The uncertainty regarding management for this group of women was evident in a paper reporting the recommendations for mode of subsequent delivery from a large UK survey [ 19 ]. Although clinical judgement and patient-centred care are always imperative, one of the strengths of our study is that it is the largest study to date to report the outcomes of using a protocol to aid clinicians in recommending mode of subsequent delivery that leaves no “equivocal” group of women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently a huge variation in the advice given to pregnant women who have sustained a previous OASI and this is reflective of the weak evidence base [ 19 ]. A previous national survey showed a wide variation in clinical practice with regard to subsequent mode of delivery recommendations [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of ongoing symptoms following OASI are likely to have had an effect on decision-making as well. The results of a recent questionnaire completed by UK consultant obstetricians reported that they would be far more likely to advise women to have a caesarean section if they had ongoing symptoms (including incontinence of flatus or stool) following a first OASI than those without symptoms [ 43 ]. This is in agreement with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guideline [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OASI can have long lasting consequences on women's continence, sexual function, and mental health, all of which significantly impact on quality of life [3]. More than half of women with OASI experience ongoing symptoms and approximately half report an impact on their future birth choices [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%