2013
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i5.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

Abstract: Colorectal cancer is a very common malignancy worldwide and development of liver metastases, both synchronous or metachronous, is a common event. Of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, up to 77% have a liver-only disease and approximately 10%-20% of patients with colorectal liver metastases are considered resectable at the time of diagnosis. Surgical resection of liver metastases remains the best treatment option and it is associated with a survival plateau and a 20%-25% of long-term survivors. Per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Restrictive criteria for eligibility of resection were introduced in the late 1980s and were as follows: four or fewer metastatic lesions, maximum tumor diameter less than 5 cm, the absence of extrahepatic disease, and a negative surgical margin of at least 1 cm ( Fig. 1) [10,11]. However, all of these criteria have been challenged over the past decade as they were derived from antiquated studies and the definition of resectability has been modified [7].…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restrictive criteria for eligibility of resection were introduced in the late 1980s and were as follows: four or fewer metastatic lesions, maximum tumor diameter less than 5 cm, the absence of extrahepatic disease, and a negative surgical margin of at least 1 cm ( Fig. 1) [10,11]. However, all of these criteria have been challenged over the past decade as they were derived from antiquated studies and the definition of resectability has been modified [7].…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 patients went on to have a laparotomy with a view to resection surgery. 22 patients (28·2%) were found to be inoperable at laparotomy; reasons for unresectability included unstable patient during anaesthetic (1), liver metastases (5), locally inoperable (13) and extensive nodal disease (3). Conclusion: Simple staging laparoscopy is still useful in detecting occult metastatic disease despite modern cross sectional imaging, prior to proceeding to laparotomy for radical resection surgery.…”
Section: Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Nhs Trust Sheffield Ukmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The incidence varies globally, with the highest rates in Europe, North America and Australasia, with significantly lower rates in Africa and South Asia. [4][5][6][7] The main determinants of resectability are tumour size, location, multifocality and hepatic reserve. 2,3 With metastasectomy, up to 50% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) can achieve long-term survival, and as opposed to the turn of the century, an increasing number of cases are deemed resectable due to advances in surgical technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 With metastasectomy, up to 50% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) can achieve long-term survival, and as opposed to the turn of the century, an increasing number of cases are deemed resectable due to advances in surgical technique. [4][5][6][7] The main determinants of resectability are tumour size, location, multifocality and hepatic reserve. The literature suggests that 5-year survival is approximately 40% after hepatic resection, and peri-operative mortality is generally less than 5%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%