Management of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review Article

Torabi, Hamidreza

doi:10.29252/ijmr-050105

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In patients with refractory disease previously treated with bevacizumab or ranibizumab injections, switching to aflibercept may be favorable in some cases. In patients treated with aflibercept after 3 injections, intravitreal dexamethasone may be a practical choice [17]. The visual and anatomical response after 3 injections of anti-VEGF treatment is a predictor of short-and long-term improvement after switching to dexamethasone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The DRCR.net Protocol T clinical trial assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF treatments including aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema (DME). Post -hoc analyses showed that after a 12-week induction period, there was still DME resolution in an increasing number of patients through week 24. Purpose To assess clinical and cost consequences of extending the anti-VEGF loading dose from 3 to 6 monthly injections in patients with persistent DME in Spain. Methods From a hospital pharmacy perspective, a cost-consequence analysis model was developed to estimate the incremental cost needed to obtain an additional response at month 6. To estimate drug treatment costs, ex-factory prices (€, 2019) were considered for aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Response/nonresponse rates at 3/6 months were obtained from the Protocol T 24-week post hoc analysis (n = 546). Persistent DME was present in 50.8 and 31.6% of the 190 aflibercept-treated patients at month 3 and month 6, respectively. Of the 176 ranibizumab- and 180 bevacizumab-treated patients, 53.2 and 72.9%, respectively, had persistent DME at month 3, and 41.5 and 65.6%, respectively, had persistent DME at month 6. Sensitivity analysis considered the split of bevacizumab vials. Results Extending the loading dose in nonresponder patients would cost €214,862.57, €208,488.98 and €134,483.16 to obtain 37, 21 and 13 additional aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab responder patients, respectively. The total number of extended injections (months 3–6) used in patients with persistent DME at month 6 was 180, 219 and 354 for aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively. Conclusions To extend the anti-VEGF loading dose from 3 to 6 injections necessitates investing €5882.77 (8 injections), €10,091.03 (14 injections) and €10,198.59 (30 injections) per additional responder patient (3-month nonresponders and 6-month responders) to aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively. For the total of patients treated, on average €7927.02 (14 injections) per additional responder patient would be needed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 The frequency of resistant or refractory DME is approximately 50%. 5 There is no clear cut off value in definition of refractory DME in published literature. Parameters used in labeling DME as recalcitrant include; no gain in visual acuity, reduced anatomical responses or frequent requirement of injections.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intravitrealversus Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Conjunction with Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Gull

Niazi

Raza³

2022

pak J Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of combined simultaneous injection of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab versus intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide in treatment of persistent refractory diabetic macular edema after intravitreal bevacizumab injection failure Methods 40 pseudophakic diabetic patients were enrolled in quasi experimental study conducted at ophthalmology department. All eyes were specifically diagnosed with persistent refractory diabetic macular edema with central retinal thickness of _____on OCT. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A was given simultaneous injection of intravitreal bevacizumab 1.25mg/0.05ml with posterior subtenon triamcinolone 40mg and group B was given intravitreal bevacizumab in conjunction with simultaneous intravitreal triamcinolone 2mg/0.05 ml.Patients were followed upmonthly till three months. Changes in the best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography were evaluated in both groups. Retreatment was given at 12 weeks interval whenever indicated by OCT. Results Group B showed a more significant decrease in the median CRT at 1month (p =0.0002)but after 3 months both groups showed a reduction in CRT which was not statistically significant between two groups _____. Both groups had significant improvement in BCVA compared to pre-injection baseline visual acuity.Between two groups BCVA changes were not statistically significant at 3 months _____.Five eyes in group B developed IOP beyond 22mmHg, which was treated with anti glaucoma medications within 2 weeks. No eye in group A developed IOP greater than 21mmHg. At 12 weeks, 7 of group A patients and 6 of group B patients developed recurrent macular edema and required repeated injections. Conclusion While treating persistent refractory diabetic macular edema, posterior subtenon triamcinolone is as effective as intravitreal triamcinolone in conjunction with intravitreal bevacizumab in reducing CRT and improving and stabilizing BCVA but in terms of IOP rise posterior subtenon injection is safer as compared to intravitreal injection. Both treatments are cost effective and combined simultaneous injections decrease the number of repeated injections.

show abstract

“…Despite the positive effects of IVB in these patients, DME can be refractory in some cases. As a result, alternative anti-VEGF drugs, argon macular lasers, intravitreal steroid injections, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have all been proposed as alternative treatment options [ 10 ]. Additionally, some investigators advocated interferon(IFN)-α2b in DME [ 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the additive effect of interferon α 2b with monthly intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in refractory diabetic macular edema

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To evaluate the additive effect of topical or sub-tenon injection of interferon (IFN)-α 2b in the treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema. Methods In this prospective study patients with center-involved DME who were unresponsive to 3 monthly consecutive IVB injections were recruited. Patients were divided into three groups: group1, received IFN- α 2b topical drop at a dose of 1mIU/ml four times a day for 3 months. Group 2, received a single sub-tenon injection of 1mIU/ml IFN- α 2b at the enrollment. Group 3 received artificial tears four times a day for 3 months (control group). All groups received three consecutive monthly IVB injections and were evaluated monthly up to 1 month following the last IVB injection. Results In this study, 59 eyes of 35 patients with refractory DME were assessed. The final follow-up showed that although CMT decreased in all groups, only patients in Group 2 had statistically significant lower CMT compared to their baseline values (change in CMT: − 117 ± 213 µm; p-value = 0.025). Comparison of CMT changes between three groups showed no statistically significant difference, although it was higher in group 2 (change in CMT: − 117 ± 213 µm (Group2) vs. − 49 ± 173 (Group 1) vs. − 36 ± 86 (Group 3); p-value = 0.085). Considering eyes with baseline CMT > 400 µm, sub-tenon injection of IFN α2b led to a significant reduction of CMT at the first month and final follow-up visit (CMT change: − 166 ± 210, − 145 ± 231 µm; p-value = 0.018 and 0.035, respectively). In this subgroup, eyes in Group 2 had lower CMT at the first month following treatment in comparison with the control group (CMT: 444 ± 123 µm vs. 544 ± 96 µm, p-value = 0.042). Alterations of CDVA were not statistically significant among groups, although patients in Group 1 had a significant improvement in vision at second and last follow up (CDVA change: − 0.23 ± 0.39, − 0.20 ± 0.43 logMAR; p-value = 0.030 and 0.010, respectively). Conclusions In short term, Sub-tenon injection of IFN might have an additive anatomical effect in eyes with refractory DME. Validation of this observation requires further prospective controlled studies.

show abstract

Management of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review Article

Cited by 5 publications

References 64 publications

Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients

Cost-consequence analysis of extended loading dose of anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular edema patients

Intravitrealversus Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Conjunction with Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Evaluation of the additive effect of interferon α 2b with monthly intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in refractory diabetic macular edema

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About