2016
DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of side effects of immune checkpoint blockade by anti‐CTLA‐4 and anti‐PD‐1 antibodies in metastatic melanoma

Abstract: SummaryCTLA-4 and PD-1 are potential targets for tumor-induced downregulation of lymphocytic immune responses. Immune checkpoint-modifying monoclonal antibodies oppose these effects, inducing T cell-mediated immune responses to various tumors including melanoma. Both anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies modify the interaction between tumor, antigen-presenting cells, and T lymphocytes. With respect to overall survival, clinical studies have shown a major benefit for the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab as well a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
173
2
172

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(236 reference statements)
2
173
2
172
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of mild irAE was also higher with ipilimumab than with nivolumab (37% [anti‐PD‐1 antibody] vs 60% [ipilimumab]). Colitis was reported to be particularly common in patients receiving ipilimumab treatment . However, hepatitis was a more common severe irAE than colitis in our study (23%, n = 7/30).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequency of mild irAE was also higher with ipilimumab than with nivolumab (37% [anti‐PD‐1 antibody] vs 60% [ipilimumab]). Colitis was reported to be particularly common in patients receiving ipilimumab treatment . However, hepatitis was a more common severe irAE than colitis in our study (23%, n = 7/30).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In past reports, the objective response rates were 3.6–16% in advanced melanoma patients given an anti‐PD‐1 antibody followed by ipilimumab . However, ipilimumab therapy is reportedly used more frequently and produces more severe immune‐related adverse events (irAE) than nivolumab . Additionally, ipilimumab is very expensive, as are other immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), increasing state‐sponsored health‐care expenditures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, severe epidermolytic skin reactions are rare. Grade 3/4 skin toxicities (without specification as to the exact dermatological condition) have been observed in less than 1 % of patients on anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies and in 5.8 % of cases treated with a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab [3,4]. Such adverse events include bullous lichenoid drug eruptions, drug-induced bullous pemphigoid as well as severe cutaneous reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).…”
Section: Severe Bullous Skin Eruptions On Checkpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management of patients with non-severe diarrhoea is mainly supportive, with antidiarrhoeals, fluid, and electrolyte supplementation. Persistence of grade 2 diarrhoea (defined as four to six stools per day for more than 3 days), should prompt initiation of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day of oral corticosteroids and ICPIs should be withheld [2, 3, 5, 13, 19, 21, 22]. The use of budesonide seems attractive since it might avoid the systemic effects of corticosteroids, though its effect in this context seems limited.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%