Management of the Prominent Ear

Gantous, Andres; Tasman, Abel‐Jan; Neves, José

doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2017.12.010

Cited by 17 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…96 anomalies in the right auricle and 103 anomalies in the left auricle were detected (Table 4). According to the incidence of deformation types in our study, conchal crus (Figure 2A); a concave leg extending from the middle part of the cavity of concha to its vertical wall, 9 Stahl ear (Figure 2B); cartilaginous structure starting from the superior crus of antihelix and passing through the fossa scaphoid towards the edge of the helix, 19 lobe ear (Figure 2C); abnormal downward curving of the upper part of the auricle and absence of the superior crus of antihelix, 20 rim kink (Figure 2D); vertical depression in the helix 21,22 and prominent ear (Figure 2E); prominent ear 23 were detected (Table 4).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

External ear anatomy and variations in neonates

ERDEM>

Fazlıoğulları

Ural

et al. 2022

Congenital Anomalies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is aesthetically important that the auricle has a natural and beautiful shape. The sizes, position and symmetry of normal auricle are used for different purposes in different disciplines. A deformation in the auricle of neonates and its size or location on the face may indicate a possible anomaly. The aim of this study is to investigate the normal sizes, anomaly types, anomaly rates and the relationship between hearing screening test results and auricular anomaly of the neonatal auricle. The length, width, angle, and distance measurements of the auricle were made in neonates (n = 550). Anomaly types of auricle were observed. Goniometer was used to measure angles; digital caliper and ruler were used to measure lengths. Anomalies were detected by the method of observation. In the morphometric data of the neonatal auricle, differences were determined in length and width values in terms of gender. Various types of anomalies were observed in the right ear of 96 participants and in the left ear of 103 participants. Normal auricle size, position and symmetry are important for surgical reconstructions, hearing aid design, producing data banks on gender, age and ethnicity, and providing reference information for multiple diagnostic and forensic procedures. Recognition and early detection of auricular anomalies play an essential role in clinical diagnosis and their correction with special devices.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

External ear anatomy and variations in neonates

ERDEM>

Fazlıoğulları

Ural

et al. 2022

Congenital Anomalies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is no specific timetable for surgical or non-surgical implementation, however, the ultimate goal is to prevent children from being bullied at school. [1,2,3] Today, the correction is covered by a non-invasive method through the product "Earbuddies" as it seems in the figure 1.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most basic disadvantage of all these methods, whether invasive or non-invasive, is the fact that after some time the ears come back into their initial place. [1,2] Therefore, there is a clear need for a non-invasive method that can meet the needs of the patients. Namely, the presence of a product that does not require the intervention of an otolaryngologist or a plastic surgeon, but the role of the physician is only advisory.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research, study, design and development of an artificial ear splint model by using a 3D printer

Argyropoulos

Botsaris

2020

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research study centers around the design and development, using a three-dimensional model of an ear-splint. This study results from the need of a non-invasive method, as the current techniques used in otoplasty have succeeded in reducing the risk of complications, but without drastically reducing the rate of postoperative deformity. Indeed, stick out ears present a deformity that occurs in 5% of the population. Factors such as psychosocial impact and intimidation lay the foundations for the need for such a method. This paper essays to create, through 3D printing, a case customized into the ear of any person of all ages. The splint was made on Zortrax M200 3D printer model, equipped with the V3 Hotend head, and the material used for printing was 16 grams of Z-FLEX. It is noted that the creation of the case is innovative and original. After putting the ear-splint into test, by applying it on a human ear, two conclusions emerge. First, it is very light, weight, just 16 grams, and second, it offers comfort and convenience to the user. In order to get results for its practicality, a clinical rehabilitation study is recommended.

show abstract

“…In general, there are 3 subtechniques (ie, cartilage sparing versus anterior or posterior scoring of the cartilage), with each technique having advantages and disadvantages. 5 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior versus Posterior Scoring of Cartilage in Otoplasty: A Retrospective Patient-related Outcome Measurement Study

Smit

Coenen

Amerongen

et al. 2020

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Various surgical techniques are applied to correct prominent ears. However, there are limited data on the effect of otoplasty on patient-related outcome measures, such as cold ears and cold intolerance. This retrospective cohort study describes the occurrence of cold intolerance in 98 patients, with a total of 196 ears in a single center during 6 years (2011–2017). Methods: In this study, 3 groups were identified: group I, anterior scoring of the cartilage (ie, Chong Chet); group II, posterior scoring of the cartilage and suture reposition of the cartilage; and group III, posterior approach without scoring (ie, Furnas and Mustardé). Parents of patients filled in a questionnaire with 40 questions to criticize the effect of surgery. Results: Symptoms of cold intolerance and pain were reported in 44.4% (n = 16) in the anterior scoring group, 48.1% (n = 26) in the posterior scoring group, and 62.5% (n = 5) in the posterior approach group without scoring of the cartilage ( P = 0.68). The satisfaction rate was significantly lower in the posterior group without scoring (Likert scale of 17.44 ± 22.01 anterior scoring, 16.02 ± 18.13 posterior scoring, and 11.13 ± 25.87 posterior approach without scoring; P = 0.02). Conclusions: This study underscores the fact that a great part of patients after otoplasty report symptoms of cold intolerance; however, these most often resolve and did not differ between different groups. Patients should be informed about this sequela. Furthermore, overall satisfaction rate was significantly lower in the posterior group without scoring.

show abstract

Management of the Prominent Ear

Cited by 17 publications

References 23 publications

External ear anatomy and variations in neonates

External ear anatomy and variations in neonates

Research, study, design and development of an artificial ear splint model by using a 3D printer

Anterior versus Posterior Scoring of Cartilage in Otoplasty: A Retrospective Patient-related Outcome Measurement Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About