Management styles and knowledge cultures, past, present and future, related to multiple-use and urban woodlands

Jönsson, Anna Maria; Gustavsson, Roland

doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00005

Cited by 16 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, the starting point of the Forest Plan of the Galician Forest Administration responds to this initiative of social participation and serious commitment to put into practice politics adapted to the reality of the neighborhood communities (Jönsson and Gustavsson 2002, Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova and Buttoud 2006, Larsen and Nielsen 2007.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lehtinen (1994) deals with the new demands of society on forest land such as those related to the enjoyment of the natural environment, which are very different from the pre-existing ones linked to agriculture and stockbreeding, as stated by Gómez Váz-quez et al (2009). According to Jönsson and Gustavsson (2002), it is important to consider strategic planning measures that provide new approaches to respond to these new social attitudes and motivations in forest management.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Are the communal forest owners involved in the management of their lands?: A qualitative analysis for the case of Galicia (Spain)

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

¿Los propietarios de bosques comunales están involucrados en la gestión de sus tierras?Un análisis cualitativo para el caso de Galicia (España) SUMMARYSociety's participation in decisions regarding land planning and management is essential to reach viable and long-lasting solutions in forest management. We analyzed the participation of communal land owners to better understand their attitudes towards the management of this property. Glaser and Strauss' Grounded Theory (1967) was used to build knowledge on the management of the property that starts in this study through the interpretation of data from personal interviews conducted in a participation process. We chose a sample of neighboring communities to conduct interviews according to the interest shown in the public participation process of a Forest Plan in a mountain area in the Autonomous Community of Galicia in northwest Spain. The communities were classified into i) very active, ii) active and iii) passive, according to their management level and geographical representation. We discovered the most active communities have more dynamic management due to their multifunctional perspective of communal forests. Regarding passive communities, their lack of interest in management is largely to recognizing a conflicted identity of the property due to physical and administrative problems.Key words: forest planning, grounded theory, neighborhood, public participation. RESUMENLa participación de la sociedad en las decisiones relativas a la planificación y gestión de la tierra es esencial para alcanzar soluciones viables y duraderas en el manejo forestal. Se analizó la participación de los propietarios de las tierras comunales para comprender mejor sus actitudes hacia la gestión de esta propiedad. Se utilizó la Grounded Theory, de Glaser y Strauss, para construir el conocimiento sobre la gestión de la propiedad que se inicia en este estudio a través de la interpretación de los datos de entrevistas personales llevadas a cabo en un proceso de participación. Elegimos una muestra de comunidades vecinales para realizar entrevistas de acuerdo con el interés mostrado en el proceso de participación pública del Plan Forestal en una zona de montaña en la Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia en el noroeste de España. Las comunidades fueron clasificadas en i) muy activa, ii) activa y iii) pasiva, de acuerdo a su nivel de gestión y representación geográfica. Descubrimos que las comunidades más activas tienen una gestión más dinámica debido a su perspectiva multifuncional de los montes comunales. Y con respecto a las comunidades pasivas, su falta de interés en la gestión se debe principalmente al reconocimiento de una identidad conflictiva de la propiedad debido a problemas de origen físico y administrativo.Palabras clave: planificación forestal, teoría fundamentada, comunidades vecinales, participación pública.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are the communal forest owners involved in the management of their lands?: A qualitative analysis for the case of Galicia (Spain)

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hitherto, the dominant forest research agenda has concentrated on providing generalized and objective facts as guidance for professionals involved in management planning (Jönsson and Gustavsson, 2002), and most research does not legitimate the scientists to reflect on how their findings can become powerful agents in creating the desired changes (Innes, 1998).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus recent research has shown that the way in which practitioners contextualize, i.e. put information into context, is largely a flow of mental images Jönsson and Gustavsson, 2002). In addition, a preliminary ''draft'' profile diagram, of how the FDT scenario could be translated into a profile diagram was prepared.…”

Section: Lifting Barriers To Communication-profile Diagramsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nature-based forest management—Where are we going?

Larsen¹,

Nielsen²

2007

Forest Ecology and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Knowledge management (KM) plays an essential role in improving the efficiency of organizations (Abell & Oxbrow, 1999;Jönsson & Gustavsson, 2002;Asgari, 2005;Adenfelt & Lagerström, 2006). Nevertheless, KM implementation within any organization is not always an easy task because there are various factors influencing KM implementation (Nonaka et al, 1994;Boisot, 1995;Brand, 1998;Andersson & Westterlind, 1999;Swan et al, 1999;Balogun & Jenkins, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review on recent advances on knowledge management implementations

Makhsousi¹,

Sadaghiani²,

Amiri³

2013

msl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge management plays an essential role on developing efficient systems in educational systems. However, there are different factors influencing the success of knowledge management. In this paper, we review recent advances on implementation of knowledge management (KM) in different areas and discuss why some of KM implementations fail and how they could turn to a successful one. The review focus more on recently published papers in different perspective from the implementation of KM in educational units to KM implementation on project management field.

show abstract

Management styles and knowledge cultures, past, present and future, related to multiple-use and urban woodlands

Cited by 16 publications

References 3 publications

Are the communal forest owners involved in the management of their lands?: A qualitative analysis for the case of Galicia (Spain)

Are the communal forest owners involved in the management of their lands?: A qualitative analysis for the case of Galicia (Spain)

Nature-based forest management—Where are we going?

A review on recent advances on knowledge management implementations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About