Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: Linking dyadic and network levels of analysis

Wilhelm, Miriam

doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.03.003

Cited by 271 publications

(221 citation statements)

References 96 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

211

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The coopetition literature usually explains tension in terms of role conflicts; 'tension' between cooperation and competition; or between the contradictions inherent in the nature of the coopetitive phenomenon; for instance, value creation versus value appropriation (cf. Wilhelm, 2011;Lacoste, 2012;Das & Teng, 2000;Tidström & Åhman, 2006). Similarly, in the paradox literature, tension is often interchanged with a paradox and described as a 'tension' between opposing dualities (cf.…”

Section: Tension or Emotional Ambivalence In Coopetition At Differentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels

Raza-Ullah

Bengtsson

Kock

2014

Industrial Marketing Management

360

348

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores the nature of the paradox inherent in coopetition; that is, the simultaneous pursuit of cooperation and competition between firms, and emanating tensions that develop at individual, organizational, and inter-organizational levels. We dissect the anatomy of the coopetition paradox to discover how it materializes by creating an external boundary (i.e., via unifying forces) and internal boundaries (i.e., via divergent forces). After explaining the coopetition paradox, we distinguish tension from paradox and submit that tension comprises both positive and negative emotions simultaneously, also known as emotional ambivalence. Finally, we recognize that emotional ambivalence in coopetition prevails at different levels, and vary in its level of intensity and persistency in relation to different contexts. We employ illustrative cases to ground our propositions empirically. This article provides understanding on concepts, expects to incite fruitful dialogue, and fuels further studies on inter-firm paradoxes.

show abstract

Section: Tension or Emotional Ambivalence In Coopetition At Differentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels

Raza-Ullah

Bengtsson

Kock

2014

Industrial Marketing Management

360

348

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other, they were perceived to be fearful of increased power emerging from the governance of clans within cluster and thus reserved the right to procure outwith the confines of the framework. This complex balancing act connected very strongly with the theory of 'triads' and the myriad of options for managing what others have termed coopetition (see Wilhelm, 2011).…”

Section: The Emergence Of Clansmentioning

confidence: 99%

The non-adoption of supply chain management

Fernie

Tennant

2013

Construction Management and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Largely taken for granted within the UK construction sector has been a view that supply chain management theory is robust, relevant and reliable. As such it has formed a substantial aspect of previous and contemporary policy and government funded research. Despite this, the prevailing view of its development and diffusion over the last 15 years within the construction industry has been problematic.Coincidentally, prevailing debates within the supply chain management academic community point to the lack of unified theory, models of diffusion and strong connections to organisation theory. Using Straussian grounded theory; iterations between data and organisation theory provided a fresh perspective on the development and diffusion of supply chain management in construction. This inductive research provided contextually rich explanations for development and diffusion that explicitly connected with and drew upon robust, relevant and reliable theories of institutions, innovation diffusion, triads, quasifirms and mechanisms of organizational governance. These explanations challenge the simplistic assumption that chains and networks of organisations are holistically managed and controlled by any single organisation or institution in the construction industry. The paper therefore shifts the debate away from proselytising supply chain management towards research that explores rigor, relevance and reliability of supply chain management assumptions in construction. The paper also exposes the gap between industry practice and policy and, questions the extent to which policy and practice do, or should, constitute a recursive relationship.

show abstract

“…Ela participou de todas as etapas do processo de desenvolvimento desde o seu início, sendo responsável por todas as interações com os usuários, pelas postagens na plataforma da internet, pela captação das ideias, pela transformação dessas ideias em briefing e pela avaliação das áreas de criação a partir do que foi requerido no site. Ao falar com os fornecedores, práticas já muito utilizadas por empresas como a Toyota (DYER e NOBEOKA, 2000) e a BMW (WILHELM, 2011).…”

Section: Discussão Dos Principais Resultadosunclassified

Inovação colaborativa: uma abordagem aberta no desenvolvimento de novos produtos

Bueno

Balestrin

2012

Rev. adm. empres.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As estratégias que as empresas têm adotado para promover inovações tecnológicas de produtos e serviços vêm mudando significativamente nos últimos anos. Um dos elementos de notável evolução diz respeito à maneira como as empresas conduzem a etapa de pesquisa e desenvolvimento (P&D) de novos produtos, serviços, processos e modelos de negócios. Diante dessa problemática, o presente artigo busca identificar práticas de inovação colaborativa no desenvolvimento de novos produtos. Para melhor compreender a mudança nos processos de inovação, elegeu-se como campo empírico um caso da indústria automotiva. Abstract The strategies adopted by companies seeking to foster technological innovations in products and services have been changing significantly in the last years. One of the elements of notable evolution is related with the way companies conduct the research & development (R&D) of new products, services, processes and business models. The present article aimed to identify practices of collaborative innovation that have been used in the development of new products and elected a case from the automotive industry as its empirical field. Even though this industry has experienced the development of R&D together with its suppliers, co-creating value with end-users is new. The unity of analysis was the development project of Fiat Mio -Fiat Concept Car III (FCCIII) and the results showed that, during the FCCIII's development process, different practices of collaborative innovation were adopted, which provided the focal organization with access to a different pool of knowledge, external to its boundaries. Palabras clave Innovación, colaboración, cocreación, industria automotriz, innovación abierta.

show abstract

Managing coopetition through horizontal supply chain relations: Linking dyadic and network levels of analysis

Cited by 271 publications

References 96 publications

The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels

The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels

The non-adoption of supply chain management

Inovação colaborativa: uma abordagem aberta no desenvolvimento de novos produtos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About