2023
DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing for Atlantic Salmon Smolt Run Timing Variability in a Changing Climate

Abstract: The Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment of Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar is listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, with dams cited as a key threat to the species. Safe, timely, and efficient passage of emigrating smolts is critical for advancing recovery goals. However, climate change and the earlier (and more variable) onset of smolt migration have challenged the effectiveness of measures designed to protect smolts. Therefore, we used data from four long-term smolt trapping sites in Maine to charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trap‐and‐transport of salmon smolts is commonly used to mitigate the impacts of hydropower developments and other in‐river obstructions (Kock et al, 2021). Smolts are trapped at night when they are actively migrating, but smolt release typically occurs during daylight hours (Frechette et al, 2023; Lothian et al, 2018; Lundqvist et al, 2010) due to safety concerns and resource limitations. The use of consistent release locations, favoring vehicle access and ease of release, can become potential pinch‐points as predator aggregations are common in such areas where feeding opportunities are elevated (Jepsen et al, 2000; Kennedy et al, 2018; Larinier & Travade, 2002).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trap‐and‐transport of salmon smolts is commonly used to mitigate the impacts of hydropower developments and other in‐river obstructions (Kock et al, 2021). Smolts are trapped at night when they are actively migrating, but smolt release typically occurs during daylight hours (Frechette et al, 2023; Lothian et al, 2018; Lundqvist et al, 2010) due to safety concerns and resource limitations. The use of consistent release locations, favoring vehicle access and ease of release, can become potential pinch‐points as predator aggregations are common in such areas where feeding opportunities are elevated (Jepsen et al, 2000; Kennedy et al, 2018; Larinier & Travade, 2002).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature and flow are environmental cues for smolt migration. Migration times differ between years and rivers; the temperature can be a good predictor of the timing [129][130][131]. Warmer temperatures result in earlier migrations [130].…”
Section: Smolt Migrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, migration route selection at a hydropower plant intake has been found to be consistent with phenotypes, and those traits selecting turbines could potentially be eliminated from the population due to high mortality [152]. A long spill time is needed to protect the earliest and latest migrating phenotypes [131]. Low flows are expected to become more frequent, especially in the southern distribution area of salmonids, and during low flows, even small weirs can cause significant delays in smolt migration impacts [153].…”
Section: Smolt Migrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smolts are juveniles preparing to transition from freshwater phenotype to saltwater phenotype during migration from freshwater streams to the ocean. The relationship between water temperature and initiation of smolt migration has been speculated to be related to a specific and/or cumulative temperature threshold but can also be impacted by day length and water discharge rates ( McCormick et al, 1998 ; Whalen et al, 1999 ; Zydlewski et al, 2005 ; Teichert et al, 2020 ; Frechette et al, 2022 ). Predictive models suggest that the mean temperature in the first 90 days of the year is a significant driver of the variation in onset of smolt migration timing across streams within a watershed ( Frechette et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between water temperature and initiation of smolt migration has been speculated to be related to a specific and/or cumulative temperature threshold but can also be impacted by day length and water discharge rates ( McCormick et al, 1998 ; Whalen et al, 1999 ; Zydlewski et al, 2005 ; Teichert et al, 2020 ; Frechette et al, 2022 ). Predictive models suggest that the mean temperature in the first 90 days of the year is a significant driver of the variation in onset of smolt migration timing across streams within a watershed ( Frechette et al, 2022 ). The survival success of the downstream migrants is also known to be dictated by environmental temperatures, and the smolts’ ability to meet certain ‘smoltification windows’ that are largely driven by temperature ( McCormick et al, 1997 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%