2019
DOI: 10.1111/imig.12648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing International Migration: Rethinking Transaction Costs, Red Tape, and Their Impact

Abstract: The debate on migration is bound to be tough and uneasy, and yet it is necessary to ask the difficult questions and listen to arguments that we may not like. Only in this way, it will be possible to have a solid and healthy discussion on the prospect of an efficient global governance regime. This Special Section addresses this imperative by exploring the prospect of turning away from ad hoc migration management towards holistic global migration governance. Migration defies any moral judgment and imposes moral … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, migration scholarship has increasingly focused on the legal and territorial mechanisms used by wealthy states to exclude asylum seekers from the global south, or policies and practices of exclusion and expulsion (Mountz 2011;Hyndman and Giles 2011;Schewel 2019). Global migration governance is limited by the confines of Westphalian state sovereignty that enables nation states to abdicate their moral and legal responsibility for asylum seekers and internally displaced nationals (Chand and Markowski 2019;Krakhmalova 2019;Visvizi et al 2019). For the past several decades, the European Union and Australia have implemented policies of interdiction, offshoring, return protocols, and readmission agreements that use various 'spatial fixes' to fundamentally undermine the obligations of international refugee law and the basic human rights it entails (Maillet et al 2018).Through its use of readmission agreements (transit country 'partnerships'), the E.U.…”
Section: Spaces Of Exclusion and Expulsion In The Global Asylum Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, migration scholarship has increasingly focused on the legal and territorial mechanisms used by wealthy states to exclude asylum seekers from the global south, or policies and practices of exclusion and expulsion (Mountz 2011;Hyndman and Giles 2011;Schewel 2019). Global migration governance is limited by the confines of Westphalian state sovereignty that enables nation states to abdicate their moral and legal responsibility for asylum seekers and internally displaced nationals (Chand and Markowski 2019;Krakhmalova 2019;Visvizi et al 2019). For the past several decades, the European Union and Australia have implemented policies of interdiction, offshoring, return protocols, and readmission agreements that use various 'spatial fixes' to fundamentally undermine the obligations of international refugee law and the basic human rights it entails (Maillet et al 2018).Through its use of readmission agreements (transit country 'partnerships'), the E.U.…”
Section: Spaces Of Exclusion and Expulsion In The Global Asylum Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several issues and topics require greater attention of the research community, if modern age migration is to be understood comprehensively (Visvizi et al , 2019). These issues include, among others: the question of individual migrant/refugee agency, especially as when confronted with the rather generic terms of “migration” and “migration flows;” the agency–structure relationship, especially as it unfolds in the act of migration per se ; and the agency-structure relation as it unfolds in the process of managing migration.…”
Section: Special Issue On Migration In Modern Age: Agency Ict and The Digitalization Of Policy Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these social phenomena, as Carrasco mentions [12], produce territorial heterogeneity and different cultural expressions that make it difficult to have a system of measurement and analysis that fully encompasses cultural identity. In this sense, Visvizi et al [16,17] propose the use of technological tools to address the challenge of refugee and migrant crises and mention that the implementation of migration policies also implies moral obligations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%