Managing Mosques in the Netherlands: Constitutional versus Culturalist Secularism

Abstract

This article engages with the emergent ethnographical study of secular practice by focusing on how local bureaucracies manage the Muslim public presence in the Netherlands, particularly the construction of new mosques and the amplifying of the Muslim call to prayer. We argue that what started as the 'Islam debate' , itself provoked by growing populist articulations of the fear of Islam, has gradually developed into a conflict in the practice of local governance about the meaning of secularism. Whereas the public and political debate about mosque issues is often dominated by what we call a 'culturalist' or 'nativist' form of secularism, in practice bureaucrats are often led by a 'constitutional secularism' that protects the constitutional rights of Dutch Muslims. Thus, in its practical application, constitutional secularism is one way of tackling Islamophobia and protecting the rights of religious minorities in general. Moving beyond the genealogical study and the deconstructivist critique of secularism by such authors as Talal Asad and Wendy Brown, we show that the ethnographic study of actual secular practice remains crucially important to avoiding monolithic text-based understandings of the secular as inherently dominating the religious.

Paisagens islâmicas na Área Metropolitana de Lisboa: (pós)colonialismo e políticas de reconhecimento

“…Finalmente, este projeto tem vindo a suscitar, em momentos distintos e com intensidades diversas, múltiplas contestações. Os argumentos contra mobilizam um conjunto de tropos que conhecemos bem de outros contextos na Europa contemporânea sempre que se discute a criação de mesquitas (Cesari 2004, Arab 2017, Verkaik & Arab 2017, inter alia), tais como o secularismo e a laicidade do estado e os riscos de guetização e de auto-segregação. Um dos elementos discursivos mobilizados contra o projecto é também a legitimidade dos actores que vão gerir a mesquita na nova praça.…”

A Racial-Religious Imagination: Syriac Christians, Iconic Bodies, and the Sensory Politics of Ethical Difference in the Netherlands

“…1414Ethnographic studies of Dutch cosmopolitan nationalism have diagnosed a gap between what Oskar Verkaaik and Pooyan Tamimi Arab (2016) term “constitutionalist secularism” and “culturalist secularism.” In this formulation, secular political practices, cultural self‐images, and perceptions of religious difference prove equally integral to Dutch attitudes toward immigration in both official commitments to pluralism and its nativist rejection. These practices and self‐images rest on the hard‐won discursive silence around both “religion” and “race” (Essed and Trienekens 2008; Tamimi Arab 2012; Wekker 2004).…”

Regulating Religious Coexistence

“…In that has developed in Kenya (Mapril et al 2017;Giumbelli 2013, 97;Burchardt, Wohlrab-Sahr and Middell 2015), in which a strong public emphasis on peace, inclusivity, and national unity goes together with persisting institutional imbalances between different religious groups, it is helpful to draw on the work of anthropologists Oskar Verkaaik and Pooyan Tamimi Arab (2017). In their analysis of secularism in the Netherlands, Verkaaik and Tamimi Arab distinguish between cultural and constitutional forms of secularism.…”