2015
DOI: 10.3390/su71215791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Nature–Business as Usual: Resource Extraction Companies and Their Representations of Natural Landscapes

Abstract: This article contributes to knowledge of how one category of business organization, very large, British-based, natural resource extraction corporations, has begun to manage its operations for sustainability. The object of study is a large volume of texts that make representations of the managing-for-sustainability practices of these multinational corporations (MNCs). The macro-level textual analysis identifies patterns in the wording of the representations of practice. Hajer's understanding of discourse, in wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The redefining and goalpost shifting of sustainability has in effect emptied the term of its original ecological meaning as a critique of environmentally harmful practices. Rather than a “precise set of structures and measures to achieve a desirable outcome” (Brown, 2015, p. 15900), sustainability now discursively operates as a “strategically deployable shifter” that lacks a coherent meaning but can be used to meet the needs of the context in which it is deployed (Kirsch, 2010). The strategically deployable nature of sustainability discourse also informed corporate reporting on the matter, including in the extractives industry, that again shift understandings of sustainability away from the environment and toward social and economic goals (Milne & Gray, 2013; Onn & Woodley, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redefining and goalpost shifting of sustainability has in effect emptied the term of its original ecological meaning as a critique of environmentally harmful practices. Rather than a “precise set of structures and measures to achieve a desirable outcome” (Brown, 2015, p. 15900), sustainability now discursively operates as a “strategically deployable shifter” that lacks a coherent meaning but can be used to meet the needs of the context in which it is deployed (Kirsch, 2010). The strategically deployable nature of sustainability discourse also informed corporate reporting on the matter, including in the extractives industry, that again shift understandings of sustainability away from the environment and toward social and economic goals (Milne & Gray, 2013; Onn & Woodley, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keyword based filtering has been popular in analyzing ESG characteristics of companies [7]. However, relying on lexical matches of query words or simple frequency statistics is prone to errors and successful text analysis require gaining a semantic understanding of the text.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on ESG language mainly relies on lexical matches against query words, or simple statistical analyses of term frequencies, which are prone to errors [6,7]. In contrast, we aim to gain semantic understanding of the text by using distributed representations of words in a vector space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green business is to assure the sustainability of the environment by establishing green growth projects. The expectation is to maintain economic growth and development by balancing long-term economic growth and environmental sustainability [18]. This model is differentiate green growth from sustainable development model.…”
Section: Corruption Prevention In Green Growth Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%