2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing product reliability in business processes ‘under pressure’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Products where no failure can be identified end up in the category 'failure not found', and no further analysis is performed to discover the consumer's reason for complaining or even returning the product. The percentage of 'failure not found' claims has grown over the past decades, as can be seen in Figure 2 12 .…”
Section: Quality and Reliability Problems From A Consumer's Perspectivementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Products where no failure can be identified end up in the category 'failure not found', and no further analysis is performed to discover the consumer's reason for complaining or even returning the product. The percentage of 'failure not found' claims has grown over the past decades, as can be seen in Figure 2 12 .…”
Section: Quality and Reliability Problems From A Consumer's Perspectivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…complaints where the product does not meet the explicit, technical, product specifications) and soft reliability problems (i.e. complaints where, in spite of meeting with the explicit product specifications, a consumer still explicitly complains about the product) 12 . The traditional reliability engineering approaches only address the failure rate caused by technical reasons (hard failures), leaving the non-technical consumer-related issues (soft failures) unaddressed.…”
Section: Quality and Reliability Problems From A Consumer's Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, along the use process, different types of failures (0-hour, early wear-out, random failures and systematic wear-out) will be encountered. Clearly distinguishing between these types of failures with respect to product use is important, as the relevance of the failure types varies with the type of product 5 . The use process may be divided into five generic phases: unpacking and installation, configuration, first use, extended use and end of use.…”
Section: Use Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the product specifications may not be complete and correct for these products and the users may have very different requirements and intended applications of the products. In particular, Brombacher et al 5 have shown that the number of 'no fault found' (NFF) or 'fault-not-found' (FNF) failures in the modern high-volume CE industry has been rising, approaching a level of nearly 50% in 2004. NFF refers to the situations where the product still performs according to the technical specifications but it is still rejected because it does not meet the customer expectations, while FNF refers to the situations where a technical failure of the product is reported but this failure cannot be reproduced by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to rapid business changes and diversified technological innovation, many services are generated and consumed in a short-term period [1]. In such a fast and volatile environment, seeking sustainability is critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%