2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1670(200003)5:1<45::aid-spip110>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing the complexity of SPI in small companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed framework is subject to validation; however, it seems eminently applicable to the Jamaican IS development context which we elaborated on previously. The structure accommodates the analyses and, we believe, provides solutions to many of the problems with the attempted application of CMM-based interventions in developing countries identified by scholars such as Curtis, et al, (1995);Davison, et al, 2000;Haase (1996); Hayes and Zubrow (1996) ;Herbsleb, et al, (1997); Herrera and Ramirez (2003) ;Horvat, et al, (2000); Ingalsbe, et al, (2001); Johnson and Brodman (1997); Leung (1999) ;Perry, et al, (1994) Richardson (2001); Richardson (2002); Saiedian and Kurara, (1995);Wang (2003).…”
Section: Figure 2: the Modified Capability Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed framework is subject to validation; however, it seems eminently applicable to the Jamaican IS development context which we elaborated on previously. The structure accommodates the analyses and, we believe, provides solutions to many of the problems with the attempted application of CMM-based interventions in developing countries identified by scholars such as Curtis, et al, (1995);Davison, et al, 2000;Haase (1996); Hayes and Zubrow (1996) ;Herbsleb, et al, (1997); Herrera and Ramirez (2003) ;Horvat, et al, (2000); Ingalsbe, et al, (2001); Johnson and Brodman (1997); Leung (1999) ;Perry, et al, (1994) Richardson (2001); Richardson (2002); Saiedian and Kurara, (1995);Wang (2003).…”
Section: Figure 2: the Modified Capability Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the overwhelming majority of research undertaken in this domain has evaluated the impact of SPI initiatives on software quality concerns within organisations in developed countries and less than a handful (Horvat, Rozman and Gyorkos, 2000;Richardson, 2001) have focused on SPI initiatives in developing countries. However, there is no evidence of such studies in Jamaica or the rest of the ESC countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative analyses of SPI approaches in small software organizations are presented in [41,2]. Accoring to Horvat et al [27] small software organizations encompass: (1) small branch companies of a large software company, (2) small independent companies, and (3) IT department within larger organizations.…”
Section: Software Process Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies on the determinants of process maturity and the delivery of high quality software products are conducted in large firms in developed countries (Gefen & Zviran, 2006;Gorla & Lin, 2010), with only a few being empirical study (Krishnan & Keller, 1999;Niazi & Babar, 2009), and even less being conducted on small firms in developing countries (Avgerou, 2008;Horvat, Rozman, & Györkös, 2000;Niazi et al, 2010;Pino, Pardo, Garcia, & Piattini, 2010;Richardson & von Wangenheim, 2007). In addition, it was discovered that there is little research in this domain in the English-speaking Caribbean (Chevers & Duggan, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%