2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
180
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
180
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the topic of water resource management, Lee et al (2012) and Barthel and Isendahl (2013) highlighted that the application of green infrastructure technology has great potential to address severe water and environmental problems due to rapid urbanization. Dhakal and Chevalier (2017) analyzed policies of U.S. cities and available literature to diagnose the obstacles of green infrastructure adoption. Dhakal and Chevalier (2017) analyzed policies of U.S. cities and available literature to diagnose the obstacles of green infrastructure adoption.…”
Section: 1029/2018ef001117mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the topic of water resource management, Lee et al (2012) and Barthel and Isendahl (2013) highlighted that the application of green infrastructure technology has great potential to address severe water and environmental problems due to rapid urbanization. Dhakal and Chevalier (2017) analyzed policies of U.S. cities and available literature to diagnose the obstacles of green infrastructure adoption. Dhakal and Chevalier (2017) analyzed policies of U.S. cities and available literature to diagnose the obstacles of green infrastructure adoption.…”
Section: 1029/2018ef001117mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current penetration of green infrastructure technologies remains low in cities (de Sousa et al, 2012). Dhakal and Chevalier (2017) analyzed policies of U.S. cities and available literature to diagnose the obstacles of green infrastructure adoption. The findings emphasize that most of the barriers come from cognitive limitations and socio-institutional arrangements.…”
Section: 1029/2018ef001117mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even amid evidence from field and monitoring studies that demonstrate the potential to improve watershed hydrologic function through LID and evidence of a high willingness to pay for associated environmental and amenity benefits among watershed inhabitants (Brent et al, 2017), widespread and watershed-scale implementation of LID lags (Dhakal and Chevalier, 2017;Fenner, 2017). Barriers to LID adoption may take the form of policy, governance, resource or cognitive barriers (Dhakal and Chevalier, 2017;Cousins, 2017;Kim and Li, 2017). With respect to policy and governance barriers to LID implementation, Dhakal and Chevalier (2017) inputs .…”
Section: Watershed-scale Lid Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to LID adoption may take the form of policy, governance, resource or cognitive barriers (Dhakal and Chevalier, 2017;Cousins, 2017;Kim and Li, 2017). With respect to policy and governance barriers to LID implementation, Dhakal and Chevalier (2017) inputs . As documented by , lack of adoption is not the only challenge facing watershed-scale implementation of LID practices; once implemented, many stormwater control measures are not properly maintained, thereby limiting potential to realize watershed hydrologic and water quality targets.…”
Section: Watershed-scale Lid Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to the implementation of green infrastructure are explored and by studying 10 US cities and 33 policies suggestions grouped into five categories, ranging from public education and awareness programs to changes in policies and governance structures (Dhakal and Chevalier, 2017). Philadelphia, PA (USA) was evaluated as a case study for governing green infrastructure, which the authors argue is as important for the success of GI as (Zidar et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning (Lidar) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%