DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036543606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing urgent care in hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
(532 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main decision is how non-elective surgeries are accommodated. We distinguish three possible policies [2,23]: (1) a dedicated policy, where there are one or more dedicated ORs for non-elective patients; (2) a flexible policy, where slack capacity is fragmented and added to each of the regular ORs, and non-electives are then fitted into the elective schedule; and (3) a hybrid policy, where policies (1) and ( 2) are combined.…”
Section: Non-elective Surgery Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main decision is how non-elective surgeries are accommodated. We distinguish three possible policies [2,23]: (1) a dedicated policy, where there are one or more dedicated ORs for non-elective patients; (2) a flexible policy, where slack capacity is fragmented and added to each of the regular ORs, and non-electives are then fitted into the elective schedule; and (3) a hybrid policy, where policies (1) and ( 2) are combined.…”
Section: Non-elective Surgery Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Veen-Berkx et al [24] find that the flexible policy is optimal by simulation while after implementation the opposite was the case. Borgman [2] carries out a simulation study in which he tests the different policies for many different hospital characteristics. His main conclusion is that the dedicated policy works best for small hospitals with at most eight ORs and that the flexible policy is best for larger hospitals.…”
Section: Non-elective Surgery Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 (page 26) shows to which extent these new reviews match our inclusion criteria. 66 searched in Chapter 2 of his Ph.D. dissertation for papers that use OR/MS methods to model and quantitatively assess patient related processes that take place within a hospital setting. Just like our study, he mainly focused on individual departments, but he limited his search to nonelective departments.…”
Section: Johnston Et Al (2009)mentioning
confidence: 99%