2008
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/41/6/065302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manifold algorithmic errors in quantum computers with static internal imperfections

Abstract: The inevitable existence of static internal imperfections and residual interactions in some quantum computer architectures results in internal decoherence, dissipation and destructive unitary shifts of active algorithms. By exact numerical simulations, we determine the relative importance and origin of these errors for a Josephson charge-qubit quantum computer. In particular we determine that the dynamics of a CNOT gate interacting with its idle neighboring qubits via native residual coupling behaves much like… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CKD captures both these effects. The large magnitude of the infidelity in both cases is due to a coherent shift of the subsystem [3,4,5]. Detailed discussions of the reasons for the different behaviors for the different coupling are given in Ref.…”
Section: Results For Average Purity and Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The CKD captures both these effects. The large magnitude of the infidelity in both cases is due to a coherent shift of the subsystem [3,4,5]. Detailed discussions of the reasons for the different behaviors for the different coupling are given in Ref.…”
Section: Results For Average Purity and Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, it is sensitive to both unitary and non-unitary errors. Since the purity is insensitive to unitary effects, large deviations between purity and fidelity can be used as an indicator of unitary errors induced by the coherent shift process [3,4,5].…”
Section: Quantitative Error Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations