2022
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202201076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating Charge Transfer and Transport via Intermediary Electron Acceptor Channels Enables 19.3% Efficiency Organic Photovoltaics

Abstract: Y-serious acceptors and the multi-components strategy, the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of the single-junction OPVs have already reached 19%, [19,20] with the best fill factors (FFs) exceeding 80%. [21,22] However, the trade-off between the open-circuit voltage (V oc ) and the short-circuit current density (J sc ) still remains as a challenge to handle with in OPV devices. [23][24][25][26][27] Therefore, the synergistic improvement of V oc and J sc will be attractive for marching the efficiencies furth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
124
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 2019, Y6 derivatives (especially for symmetric molecules) have become a hot topic of study in OPVs due to their excellent properties such as low band gaps and high electron mobility. , In addition to the symmetrical nonfullerene acceptors, asymmetrical nonfullerene (ANF) acceptors have recently been used successfully in OPVs. In general, ANF acceptors are classified as asymmetry skeleton type nonfullerenes (ASNFs, A–D 1 A′D 2 –A) and asymmetry terminal type nonfullerenes (ATNFs, A 1 –DA′D–A 2 ) acceptors. Very recently, ternary OPV devices using the ATNF acceptor as the third component had excellent PCEs of over 19%. , However, an ASNF acceptor as the third component has never been studied or reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since 2019, Y6 derivatives (especially for symmetric molecules) have become a hot topic of study in OPVs due to their excellent properties such as low band gaps and high electron mobility. , In addition to the symmetrical nonfullerene acceptors, asymmetrical nonfullerene (ANF) acceptors have recently been used successfully in OPVs. In general, ANF acceptors are classified as asymmetry skeleton type nonfullerenes (ASNFs, A–D 1 A′D 2 –A) and asymmetry terminal type nonfullerenes (ATNFs, A 1 –DA′D–A 2 ) acceptors. Very recently, ternary OPV devices using the ATNF acceptor as the third component had excellent PCEs of over 19%. , However, an ASNF acceptor as the third component has never been studied or reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, ternary OPV devices using the ATNF acceptor as the third component had excellent PCEs of over 19%. 33,34 However, an ASNF acceptor as the third component has never been studied or reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, BTP-S10 and L8-BO will form the parallel-like phase morphology when mixed with PM6 (ω BTP-S10 is −0.88 for PM6:L8-BO:BTP-S10 blend), which was also confirmed in our previous work. [46] So, the multiphase morphology could be realized in this quaternary blend.…”
Section: Multiphase Morphology Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] In the past few decades, researchers put tremendous effort into pursuing high power conversion efficiency (PCE) for OSCs, and as a consequence values 419% have been reported by many different groups. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, the fruitful development solely of efficiency enhancement cannot fulfill the requirement of commercialized photovoltaic (PV) cargo, where the device stability matters equally importantly. [18][19][20] Due to the intrinsic disadvantages of small molecules in morphology stability, OSC devices with superior stability are more feasible when they contain an active layer with both polymeric donor(s) and acceptor(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%