Mantle-Crust Interaction in Petrogenesis of the Gabbro-Granite Association in the Preobrazhenka Intrusion, Eastern Kazakhstan

Хромых, С. В.; Цыганков, А. А.; Бурмакина, Г. Н.; Котлер, П. Д.; Sokolova, E. N.

doi:10.1134/s0869591118040045

Cited by 15 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…2). The results from some units have been reported in recent publications [Khromykh et al, 2011[Khromykh et al, , 2013[Khromykh et al, , 2014[Khromykh et al, , 2016[Khromykh et al, , 2017a[Khromykh et al, , 2017b[Khromykh et al, , 2018. In this paper, we present a brief overview of the obtained data with implications for post-collisional processes in the region.…”

Section: Systemmentioning

confidence: 69%

“…The rocks of the two groups formed separately by differentiation of mafic and granitic parent magmas, which intruded synchronously, as evidenced by the presence of mingling structures (Fig. 6, b-d) [Khromykh et al, 2017a[Khromykh et al, , 2018. The Preobrazhenka intrusion was dated at 290±2 Ma (LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb, Qtz monzonite) and 290±1 Ma (LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb, granite) ( Fig.…”

Section: Complex Gabbro-granite Intrusions (290-280 Ma)mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…6, e-f). The Tastau granodiorites and granosyenites have LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages of 289±2 and 280±1 Ma, respectively [Khromykh et al, 2018].…”

Section: Complex Gabbro-granite Intrusions (290-280 Ma)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Preobrazhenka mafic and granitic rocks have independent composition trends in binary diagrams [Khromykh et al, 2017a[Khromykh et al, , 2018. Blue circles mark mingling relations between granosyenite (phase 3) and monzodiorite (phase 4).…”

Section: Complex Gabbro-granite Intrusions (290-280 Ma)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6. (а) -схема геологического строения Преображенского габбро-гранитного массива [Khromykh et al, 2017a[Khromykh et al, , 2018. Голубыми кружками отмечены места проявления минглинг-взаимоотношений между граносиенитами 3-й фазы и монцодиоритами 4-й фазы.…”

Section: Complex Gabbro-granite Intrusions (290-280 Ma)unclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Review of Early Permian (300–270 Ma) Magmatism in Eastern Kazakhstan and Implications for Plate Tectonics and Plume Interplay

Хромых

Котлер

Изох

et al. 2019

Geodin. tektonofiz.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The history of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) was marked by several major events of magmatism which produced large volumes of volcanic and intrusive (mafic-ultramafic and granitic) rocks within a relatively short time span (30–40 Ma) over a vast area. The magmatic activity postdated the orogenic stages of accretionary-collisional belts in Central Asia and likely resulted from the impact of mantle plumes that formed Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). The formation of the Tarim–South Mongolia LIP at 300–270 Ma is the best known among the major Permian events of basaltic and granitic magmatism. Early Permian igneous rocks (volcanic, subvolcanic and intrusive suites that vary from ultramafic to felsic compositions) of the same age range (300 to 270 Ma) have been recently found also in Eastern Kazakhstan, within the late Paleozoic Altai collisional system. The compositions and ages of the rocks suggest that the Eastern Kazakhstan magmatism was the northward expansion of the Tarim LIP. The spread of the Tarim LIP was apparently facilitated by lithospheric extension after the Siberia-Kazakhstan collision. The extension led to rheological weakening of the lithosphere whereby deep mantle melts could penetrate to shallower depths. The early Permian history of Eastern Kazakhstan was controlled by the interplay of plate tectonic and plume processes: plate-tectonic accretion and collision formed the structural framework, and the Tarim mantle plume was a heat source maintaining voluminous magma generation.

show abstract