2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mantle discontinuities beneath the Deccan volcanic province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower crustal velocities under the EDC are consistently in the 3.8–3.9 km/s range, while lower crustal velocities under the Deccan Traps are in the 3.9–4.0 km/s range. A comparison to independent velocity‐depth profiles from receiver functions [ Ravi Kumar and Mohan , 2005; S. S. Rai et al , 2003; Ravi Kumar et al , 2001] is again provided in Figure 6 and, except for station KRD, the comparison is good. Crustal thicknesses under the Deccan Traps were reported in the 36–40 km range along the Koyna I and II DSS profiles [ Kaila and Krishna , 1992; Krishna et al , 1991, 1989], which is consistent with our inferred values.…”
Section: Crustal Structure Variationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lower crustal velocities under the EDC are consistently in the 3.8–3.9 km/s range, while lower crustal velocities under the Deccan Traps are in the 3.9–4.0 km/s range. A comparison to independent velocity‐depth profiles from receiver functions [ Ravi Kumar and Mohan , 2005; S. S. Rai et al , 2003; Ravi Kumar et al , 2001] is again provided in Figure 6 and, except for station KRD, the comparison is good. Crustal thicknesses under the Deccan Traps were reported in the 36–40 km range along the Koyna I and II DSS profiles [ Kaila and Krishna , 1992; Krishna et al , 1991, 1989], which is consistent with our inferred values.…”
Section: Crustal Structure Variationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most recently, point estimates of the bulk Vp/Vs ratio and thickness of the crust have been obtained for a number of broadband stations from receiver functions [ Gupta et al , 2003a, 2003b; S. S. Rai et al , 2003, 2005, 2006; Jagadeesh and Rai , 2008; Ravi Kumar et al , 2001; Sarkar et al , 2003; Ravi Kumar and Mohan , 2005; Mohan and Ravi Kumar , 2004; Gaur and Priestley , 1997; Zhou et al , 2000; Kiselev et al , 2008; Rai et al , 2009]. The majority of these receiver function studies concentrate in the south Indian shield, and have reported significant changes in crustal thickness among its building terranes.…”
Section: Geology and Crustal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the low‐density layer reported (Pandey et al 1996) is based on widely spaced gravity data and is modelled to be uniform, the LVZ delineated in the present study is non‐uniform and varies in magnitude between stations. The upper mantle image down to 700 km beneath DVP reveals that the LVZ is confined only to the shallow upper mantle and, therefore, maybe unrelated to any large scale processes such as the Deccan episode (Ravi Kumar & Mohan 2005). Low‐velocity zones are manifestations of thermal/chemical anomalies associated with regional/local causatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Rathore et al 2000;Fig.3. Mean S-wave velocity variation beneath south Indian shield as computed from recently acquired seismic data (Rai et al 1999(Rai et al , 2003Ravi Kumar et al 2001;Sarkar et al 2003;Gupta and Rai, 2005;Ravi Kumar and Mohan, 2005). For comparison, crustal velocity distribution as predicted by average 1-D global model ak 135 (Kennett et al 1995) as well as that inferred for global shields and platforms (Christensen and Mooney, 1995) are also included.…”
Section: Deccan Volcanics Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%