2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manual, semi-automated, and automated delineation of chronic brain lesions: A comparison of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brain lesions from each patient were drawn on the standard Montreal Neurological Institute's (MNI) brain template by a trained assistant naive to the patients' neuropsychological profile using the MRICro software (Rorden and Brett, 2000, for similar approaches see Spierer et al (2009), or Manuel et al (2013). The manual reconstruction of the lesions on a template has been demonstrated to be as accurate as automatic or semi-automatic reconstruction in two comparative studies (Fiez et al, 2000;Wilke et al, 2011). We would further note that the manual procedure was well adapted to the present retrospective study in which lesion reconstructions were based on clinical radiologic data that were not acquired for research purposes and thus showed variable acquisition parameters.…”
Section: Voxel-based Statistical Analyses Of Anatomo-functional Corrementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Brain lesions from each patient were drawn on the standard Montreal Neurological Institute's (MNI) brain template by a trained assistant naive to the patients' neuropsychological profile using the MRICro software (Rorden and Brett, 2000, for similar approaches see Spierer et al (2009), or Manuel et al (2013). The manual reconstruction of the lesions on a template has been demonstrated to be as accurate as automatic or semi-automatic reconstruction in two comparative studies (Fiez et al, 2000;Wilke et al, 2011). We would further note that the manual procedure was well adapted to the present retrospective study in which lesion reconstructions were based on clinical radiologic data that were not acquired for research purposes and thus showed variable acquisition parameters.…”
Section: Voxel-based Statistical Analyses Of Anatomo-functional Corrementioning
confidence: 84%
“…For VLSM analyses, stroke lesions were manually drawn in all three planes (axial, coronal, sagittal) on each slice of the T 1 images using MRIcron (Rorden and Brett, 2000), as it has been shown to be the best method for lesion mapping as compared with semi-automated or automated processing (Wilke et al, 2011). FLAIR images were used as a reference.…”
Section: Imaging Methods and Voxel-based Lesion-symptom Mapping Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kennedy et al (2009) suggest that VBM techniques provide a reasonable Bfirst pass^for determination of where differences may reside between two groups, but manual tracing of specific ROIs may provide the most accurate quantitative measurements (also see Wilke et al 2011). Relatedly, Wenger et al (2014) have shown that in younger healthy control, typically developing individuals (20-30 years of age) where there would be minimal age related differences and reduced likelihood of underlying pathology that automated methods approximate manual tracing.…”
Section: Overview Of Structural Neuroimaging Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%