2016 Third International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and Their Applications (TSA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsa.2016.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturing Ontology Development Based on Industry 4.0 Demonstration Production Line

Abstract: The increasing pressures faced by manufacturers, the shortening of innovation cycles and the growing importance of high-efficiency manufacturing demand a higher versatility of factory automation. In order to achieve this target, engineering tasks currently performed manually need to be automated. In this case, ontologies emerge as a significant method for representing manufacturing knowledge in a machine-interpretable way. This knowledge can then be used by automated problem-solving methods to reconfigure the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first thing that should be done when developing ontology for the manufacturing domain is the common concept that is involved in all major portions of knowledge specification. We can obtain all the knowledge by consulting domain experts and referring to relevant knowledge base [53].…”
Section: Assembly Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first thing that should be done when developing ontology for the manufacturing domain is the common concept that is involved in all major portions of knowledge specification. We can obtain all the knowledge by consulting domain experts and referring to relevant knowledge base [53].…”
Section: Assembly Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Industry 4.0 ontological landscape, as described by Sampath Kumar et al (2019), consists of: (i) a wide range of ontologies focused on specific industrial domains (e.g., maintenance [Haupert et al, 2014], resource reconfiguration [Wan et al, 2018], cloud robotics [de Freitas et al, 2020]), (ii) ontological frameworks that their goal is to cover the wider domain of smart manufacturing (e.g., the production line [Cheng et al, 2016]) and (iii) a set of core ontologies that their scope is even more generic (e.g., O4I4 Sampath Kumar et al, 2019). The RFID SCO is a domain ontology for the configuration of RFID systems, and hence, it belongs to the first set of ontologies developed for Industry 4.0.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, two ontological frameworks tending to cover the wider domain of smart manufacturing have been proposed. Hence, Cheng et al (2016) provided a model of the production line using a combination of five ontologies, namely, device ontology (with concepts such as Machine), process ontology (with a taxonomy of the different Operations performed by the technical equipment), parameter ontology (with concepts such as Quality of Service), product ontology (with the product information), and the base ontology (integrated the four others and defining the concept Order). On the other hand, Engel et al (2018) proposed a three-layer ontology for batch process plants.…”
Section: Industry 40 Ontological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%