There has been a revival of interest in localization phenomena in quasiperiodic systems with a view to examining how they differ fundamentally from such phenomena in random systems. Motivated by this, we study transport in the quasiperiodic, one-dimentional (1d) Aubry-Andre model and its generalizations to 2d and 3d. We study the conductance of open systems, connected to leads, as well as the Thouless conductance, which measures the response of a closed system to boundary perturbations. We find that these conductances show signatures of a metal-insulator transition from an insulator, with localized states, to a metal, with extended states having (a) ballistic transport (1d), (b) superdiffusive transport (2d), or (c) diffusive transport (3d); precisely at the transition, the system displays sub-diffusive critical states. We calculate the beta function β(g) = d ln(g)/d ln (L) and show that, in 1d and 2d, single-parameter scaling is unable to describe the transition. Furthermore, the conductances show strong non-monotonic variations with L and an intricate structure of resonant peaks and subpeaks. In 1d the positions of these peaks can be related precisely to the properties of the number that characterizes the quasiperiodicity of the potential; and the L-dependence of the Thouless conductance is multifractal. We find that, as d increases, this non-monotonic dependence of g on L decreases and, in 3d, our results for β(g) are reasonably well approximated by single-parameter scaling.The single-parameter scaling theory of Abrahams, et al., [1] has played an important part in our understanding of Anderson localization and metal-insulator transitions in disordered systems, e.g., non-interacting electrons in a random potential [2]. Localization phenomena are, however, not only restricted to random systems, but also occur in other systems, the most prominent examples being systems with quasiperiodic potentials [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].Recently such quasiperiodic systems have attracted a lot of attention because of the experimental observation of many-body localization (MBL) in quasiperiodic lattices of cold atoms [12]. These have brought back into focus the need to examine the essential similarities and differences between random and quasiperiodic systems at the level of eigenstates [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], dynamics [13][14][15], and universality classes of localization-delocalization transitions [16]. It has also been argued [16] that quasiperiodic systems provide more robust realizations of Many Body Localization (MBL) than their random counterparts because the former do not have rare regions, which are locally thermal. Therefore, we may find a stable MBL phase in dimension d > 1 in a quasiperiodic system, but not in a random system, where the MBL phase may be destabilised because of such rare regions [17,18].
Non-interactingquasiperiodic systems exhibit delocalization-localization transitions even in one dimension (1d), unlike random systems in which all states are localized in dimensions d = 1 and 2 for ort...