2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many-objective portfolio optimization approach for stormwater management project selection encouraging decision maker buy-in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that solutions are not "prescriptive", as outlined above, is also likely to increase trust in the overall optimization process. However, the degree to which the solutions developed with the aid of simulation-optimization approaches are trusted is likely to be a function of the degree to which decision-makers are familiar with and trust the simulation model, especially of the optimal solutions do not correspond with expectations (Di Matteo et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that solutions are not "prescriptive", as outlined above, is also likely to increase trust in the overall optimization process. However, the degree to which the solutions developed with the aid of simulation-optimization approaches are trusted is likely to be a function of the degree to which decision-makers are familiar with and trust the simulation model, especially of the optimal solutions do not correspond with expectations (Di Matteo et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Inselberg, 2009) to visualize Pareto-optimal solutions. Visualizing performance objectives can assist stakeholders to compare with the scheme before the optimization and select key tradeoff schemes with a clearer perspective (Matteo et al, 2019;Maier et al, 2014). Moreover, decision-makers can eliminate redundant schemes based on the preferred objectives or concerns and filter the optimal subsets those probably adopted by the experienced practitioners.…”
Section: Visual Analytics Of Pareto-frontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies rarely consider many-objective optimization in the basin-scale water management with conjunctive use of SW and GW. The management model including the typical single objective or bi-objective formulation probably results in the decision bias (i.e., cognitive myopia or short-sightedness) due to the sub-optimal solution only considering the fewer preference criteria (Kasprzyk et al, 2012(Kasprzyk et al, , 2015Woodruff et al, 2013;Matteo et al, 2019). Therefore, for water management with the strong interactions between SW and GW in the basin-scale water cycle, the optimal water use practice calls for decision-maker to consider multiple conflicting management objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) multi/many-objective optimization algorithms based on decomposition strategy and (3) indicator-based evolutionary algorithms. The application of many-objective optimization can be demonstrated in stormwater management project selection, encouraging decision-maker buy-in [96]. Additionally, the application can also be seen in mixed-model disassembly line balancing along with multi-robotic workstation [97].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%