2017
DOI: 10.3233/sw-160246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Map-On: A web-based editor for visual ontology mapping

Abstract: This paper presents Map-On, a web-based editor for visual ontology mapping developed at the Architecture, Representation and Computation research group of the La Salle at Ramon Llull University. The Map-On editor provides a graphical environment for ontology mapping creation based on the representation of mapping using an interactive graph layout. Thus, a point-and-click interface simplifies the mapping creation process. Based on the user inputs the editor automatically generates a R2RML document, particularly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each data source has been mapped to the ontology using the R2RML standard mapping language. The mappings have been created with Map-On tool [14]. Transformation of the data sources into RDF.…”
Section: Integration Of Building Data With Semantic Web Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each data source has been mapped to the ontology using the R2RML standard mapping language. The mappings have been created with Map-On tool [14]. Transformation of the data sources into RDF.…”
Section: Integration Of Building Data With Semantic Web Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors of [10] introduced a collaborative ontology mapping environment Map-On. The Map-On tool supports creating of mappings between a database schema and existing domain ontology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prevents the users from specifying the desired annotations for the data sources. In the past, graphical editors were proposed, e.g., the RMLEditor [4] and Map-On [7], to enhance the workflow of defining rules. However, next to users who prefer a graphical approach, there are users who desire a text-based approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%