2014
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/4/925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAP reconstruction for Fourier rebinned TOF-PET data

Abstract: Time-of-flight (TOF) information improves signal to noise ratio in Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Computation cost in processing TOF-PET sinograms is substantially higher than for nonTOF data because the data in each line of response is divided among multiple time of flight bins. This additional cost has motivated research into methods for rebinning TOF data into lower dimensional representations that exploit redundancies inherent in TOF data. We have previously developed approximate Fourier methods that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Algorithms based upon update procedures of the maximum-likelihood (ML)-expectation-maximization (EM) [1]–[5], maximum a posterior (MAP) [6]–[9], and penalized maximum likelihood (PML) methods [10]–[12], especially in an order-subset (OS) form [13]–[18], have been investigated and developed for reconstructing images of pre-clinical and clinical utility from time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography (PET) [19]–[21]. However, some of the algorithms may also yield images of limited axial volume coverage (AVC) and of considerably deteriorating quality when applied to data of low counts [22], [23], which are often of application interests in performing fast and/or low-dose TOF-PET imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms based upon update procedures of the maximum-likelihood (ML)-expectation-maximization (EM) [1]–[5], maximum a posterior (MAP) [6]–[9], and penalized maximum likelihood (PML) methods [10]–[12], especially in an order-subset (OS) form [13]–[18], have been investigated and developed for reconstructing images of pre-clinical and clinical utility from time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography (PET) [19]–[21]. However, some of the algorithms may also yield images of limited axial volume coverage (AVC) and of considerably deteriorating quality when applied to data of low counts [22], [23], which are often of application interests in performing fast and/or low-dose TOF-PET imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased calculation time caused by slow convergence using the new system is also an important factor that needs to be addressed in the future. Additional constraints such as boundary information could be added by using Maximum a posterior (MAP) (Bai et al 2014) approach for faster determination of boundary and background information in the early convergence stage. The update equation (10) could also be optimized by inverting measurement matrix M before reconstruction for faster convergence speed.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for (30), both the approximate and exact implementations of Fourier rebinning for 3D non-TOF PET were given in Defrise et al (1997) and Liu et al (1999); the corresponding inverse rebinning for 3D non-TOF PET was given in Cho et al (2007). The approximate implementation of (20) to rebin 3D TOF-PET to 3D non-TOF PET data was implemented elsewhere (Cho et al 2009, Ahn et al 2011, Bai et al 2014. The exact rebinning of 3D TOF-PET data to 2D TOF-PET data using the consistency equation ( 17) was given in Defrise et al (2008).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%