2020
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAPK Pathway Alterations Correlate with Poor Survival and Drive Resistance to Therapy in Patients with Lung Cancers Driven by ROS1 Fusions

Abstract: Purpose: ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) provide significant benefit in lung adenocarcinoma patients with ROS1 fusions. However, as observed with all targeted therapies, resistance arises. Detecting mechanisms of acquired resistance (AR) is crucial to finding novel therapies and improve patient outcomes.Experimental Design: ROS1 fusions were expressed in HBEC and NIH-3T3 cells either by cDNA overexpression (CD74/ROS1, SLC34A2/ROS1) or CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genomic engineering (EZR/ROS1). We reviewed targe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, sustained downstream pathway activation was also detected and could be overcome in vitro with combination entrectinib and selumetinib. These data were consistent with other reports that have demonstrated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway as mediators of innate and acquired resistance for both ROS1 and TRK fusions ( 32 , 33 ). In patients with tumors harboring ROS1 fusions, MAPK upregulation was also associated with worse survival ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, sustained downstream pathway activation was also detected and could be overcome in vitro with combination entrectinib and selumetinib. These data were consistent with other reports that have demonstrated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway as mediators of innate and acquired resistance for both ROS1 and TRK fusions ( 32 , 33 ). In patients with tumors harboring ROS1 fusions, MAPK upregulation was also associated with worse survival ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These data were consistent with other reports that have demonstrated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway as mediators of innate and acquired resistance for both ROS1 and TRK fusions ( 32 , 33 ). In patients with tumors harboring ROS1 fusions, MAPK upregulation was also associated with worse survival ( 32 ). In a plasma-based NGS analysis of 18 paired blood samples at baseline and on disease progression on entrectinib from STARTRK-2 trial, acquired on-target ROS1 resistance mutations (G2032R and F2004C/I) were detected in four (28%) patients ( 34 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These include the known ROS1 resistance alterations composed of ROS1 point mutation and the likely ROS1 resistance alterations based on our literature search composed of KIT mutations, EGFR mutations, KRAS mutations/amplifications, NRAS mutations, MAP2K1 mutations and NF1 mutations. [20][21][22][23][24][25] In our NSCLC cohort, we saw that half of the known and likely resistance alterations were ROS1 kinase domain point mutations which can potentially lead to steric interferences with drug binding that causes ROS1 therapy inhibition and were likely acquired post-treatment. 20,24 This contrasts with the non-NSCLC cohort where no ROS1 point mutations was identified, likely due to the lower prevalence of ROS1-TKI treatment in this group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When examining the 25 genes with the most GA in NSCLC ROS1 fusion pos cases and NSCLC ROS1 fusion neg cases, we KIT mutations, EGFR mutations, KRAS mutations/amplifications, NRAS mutations, MAP2K1 mutations and NF1 mutations. [20][21][22][23][24][25] In NSCLC, the rate of known or likely alterations potentially contributing to resistance to ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was 7.3% (20/275) (Table S8) For the non-NSCLC cohort, the rate of known or likely alterations potentially contributing to resistance to ROS1 TKIs was 4.9% (4/81) ( Table S9).…”
Section: Mutational Profile In Subsets Of Ros1 Fusion and Ros1 Wildmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells expressing the fusion were selected using 200 mg/mL hygromycin. The HBECp53-SLC3A2-NRG1 cells are an unselected population in which the SLC3A2-NRG1 fusion has been introduced by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing, as we have described previously for ROS1 and BRAF fusions (20,21). HCC-95 cells were obtained from Dr. William Lockwood (BC Cancer Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, RRID: CVCL_5137) and these cells were found to have NRG1 amplification by whole-exome sequencing (2).…”
Section: Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%