2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9965-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping a Telecommunication Application on a Multiprocessor System-on-Chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous contribution targetting the generation of virtual prototypes for this particular class of applications [13], design and mapping were purely text-based, thus limiting its usage mostly to academic research, and not to engineers more willing to use graphical frameworks. Hardware components had to be either described by hand, which is errorprone, or generated from a Python specification, and thus be practically unreadable and hard to debug or refactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous contribution targetting the generation of virtual prototypes for this particular class of applications [13], design and mapping were purely text-based, thus limiting its usage mostly to academic research, and not to engineers more willing to use graphical frameworks. Hardware components had to be either described by hand, which is errorprone, or generated from a Python specification, and thus be practically unreadable and hard to debug or refactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of throughput obtained in[6] compared to the implementation based on Disydent presented in[3] was a factor of 3.5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One packet of the reference application is treated on average every 675 cycles on the platform containing VCI MWMR stats, as opposed to every 563 cycles on the platform shown in [6]; the simulation overhead is thus around 18%. …”
Section: B Dimensioning the Input Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hardware is described at several abstraction levels: TLM (Transaction level), CABA (Cycle/Bit Accurate), and RTL (Register Transfer Level). SoCLib also contains a set of performance evaluation tools (Genius et al, 2011). Last but not least, the SoCLib prototyping platform comes with an operating system well adapted to multiprocessor-on-chip (Becoulet, 2009).…”
Section: Simulation Verification and Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%