2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping canopy nitrogen in European forests using remote sensing and environmental variables with the random forests method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm of Random forests was developed by Breiman et al [43] and shows a promising capability to avoid overfitting by sampling the predictor space randomly. It can construct non-linear relationships without the limitations of the assumptions of variable distributions and dependency [12]. In addition, RF could effectively evaluate the importance of independent variables and partly deal with multicollinearity among variables while having great tolerance to noises and outliers.…”
Section: Random Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The algorithm of Random forests was developed by Breiman et al [43] and shows a promising capability to avoid overfitting by sampling the predictor space randomly. It can construct non-linear relationships without the limitations of the assumptions of variable distributions and dependency [12]. In addition, RF could effectively evaluate the importance of independent variables and partly deal with multicollinearity among variables while having great tolerance to noises and outliers.…”
Section: Random Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VIs and biophysical variables derived from Sentinel-2 satellite images were examined for estimation of plant N status [11]. Loozen et al [12] used satellite-based VIs and environmental variables to map crop N in European forests. Yet today, the application of satellite-based VIs is still challenged for crop N status assessment because of the limited spatial resolution, the infrequency of satellite overpasses, and the risk of poor image data quality due to atmospheric conditions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the previous studies on crop physiological parameter estimation have demonstrated that the RF algorithm exhibits high accuracy and estimation ability, and confers the advantages of strong stability and high e ciency when compared with other modeling methods. Loozen et al [55] used RF technology estimate the N content of a European forest canopy, which exhibited superior accuracy (R 2 = 0.62, RMSE = 0.18). To establish an e cient method for estimating winter wheat biomass, Yue et al [56] used RF algorithm to develop a regression model of winter wheat biomass by combining spectrum, radar backscattering, vegetation index, and radar vegetation index, and the results revealed the potential application of stochastic forest algorithm in remote sensing to estimate winter wheat biomass.…”
Section: Comparison Between Wnn and Rfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm classifies the data by integrating votes from a mass of decision trees, which are built by fitting the features of training samples subsets generated randomly. There are three parameters governing the Random Forest algorithm: the number of trees (ntree), the minimum number of terminal seeds (nodesize), and the number of features (mtry) [47]. In our study, ntree was set to 200, since previous studies have found that if the number of decision trees is larger than 120, the accuracies of maps become more stable [27].…”
Section: Mapping Mangrove Forests With Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%