2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific understanding of assessment framework components (Table 1, Figure 2) and how they emphasize soil ES may encourage decision makers to follow the soil ES approach in land planning (Swinton et al, 2007). In addition, its combined biophysical approach provides a decisionsupport tool that allows estimation of potential provision of soil ES due to land planning strategies and differentiation of land management options and the soil ES they may provide (i.e., tradeoffs and synergies) (Loft et al, 2015;Ruhl, 2016;Bommarco et al, 2018;Kim and Arnhold, 2018).…”
Section: Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scientific understanding of assessment framework components (Table 1, Figure 2) and how they emphasize soil ES may encourage decision makers to follow the soil ES approach in land planning (Swinton et al, 2007). In addition, its combined biophysical approach provides a decisionsupport tool that allows estimation of potential provision of soil ES due to land planning strategies and differentiation of land management options and the soil ES they may provide (i.e., tradeoffs and synergies) (Loft et al, 2015;Ruhl, 2016;Bommarco et al, 2018;Kim and Arnhold, 2018).…”
Section: Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it does so by producing knowledge, this soil ES assessment framework supports the nature-based solutions approach, which aims to conciliate socio-economic development goals with beneficial outcomes for both society and the environment (European Commission (EC), 2015; Faivre et al, 2017;Lafortezza et al, 2017). As an agricultural soil-based assessment, the framework includes a soil security dimension (McBratney et al, 2014) by considering the resilience and sustainable use of soils (i.e., conserving soil natural assets) and provides a tool that addresses soil ES trade-offs (Kim and Arnhold, 2018) through the ability to arbitrate land management strategies effectively (e.g., supply vs. demand, land sharing vs. land sparing).…”
Section: Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of external factors has also been studied in a number of papers [7][8]. A great contribution to the study of individual agricultural branches in various countries of the world was made by the following authors: Kim and Arnhold, Aydın and Aktürk, Wagena et al, Yamashita and Hoshino, Ramos et al [30][31][32][33][34]. The authors also considered it expedient to determine the degree of influence on the productivity of agriculture of such factors as the use of innovations, investments and commissioning of fixed assets with the aim of possible adjustment of the existing regional policy, since such estimations were practically not conducted.…”
Section: Scientific and Technical Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the conflicts arising within human settlements are rooted in the planning approaches or the lack of them [12]. Whether we refer to conflicts generated by the association of incompatible functions [13][14][15][16], pollution effects [17], nature conservation actions [18], land ownership [19,20] or limited accessibility levels [21], they are all directly or indirectly rooted in the planning systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%