2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8090719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Forest Health Using Spectral and Textural Information Extracted from SPOT-5 Satellite Images

Abstract: Abstract:Forest health is an important variable that we need to monitor for forest management decision making. However, forest health is difficult to assess and monitor based merely on forest field surveys. In the present study, we first derived a comprehensive forest health indicator using 15 forest stand attributes extracted from forest inventory plots. Second, Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between the forest health indicator and the spectral and textural measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported that 74% of the defoliation was detected with a misclassification of undisturbed areas of 39% in those pixels where at least 50% birch forest cover was present. SPOT-5 images were investigated for forest health in [49], the authors acquired several structural indicators from these images and defined forest health indicator from them. The final forest health indicator was evaluated with RMSE of 1.674 and R-square of 0.47.…”
Section: Assessing Forest Health and Physiology Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors reported that 74% of the defoliation was detected with a misclassification of undisturbed areas of 39% in those pixels where at least 50% birch forest cover was present. SPOT-5 images were investigated for forest health in [49], the authors acquired several structural indicators from these images and defined forest health indicator from them. The final forest health indicator was evaluated with RMSE of 1.674 and R-square of 0.47.…”
Section: Assessing Forest Health and Physiology Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LiDAR and hyperspectral data possess high potential for species classification, their operational use is restricted owing to limited availability and high acquisition costs [3,24], and the applicability of these data in a regional or global scale is still limited [25]. Therefore, optical multispectral data are often considered a good alternative to LiDAR data [26]. Currently, radar (synthetic aperture radar) data are used in tree species mapping, particularly for the determination of broad-leaved forest types [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the best subset variable selection procedure using the leaps package [58] in R statistical software [59] and the selection of potential independent variables was restricted to a combination of up to five independent variables with minimum Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) as selection criteria. Since multicollinearity normally occurs between remotely sensed variables [60], we further removed collinear variables using variance inflation factors (VIF). This procedure was repeated for logarithmic and square root transformed dependent variable.…”
Section: Model Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%