Mapping geographical inequalities in access to drinking water and sanitation facilities in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000–17

Abstract

Summary Background Universal access to safe drinking water and sanitation facilities is an essential human right, recognised in the Sustainable Development Goals as crucial for preventing disease and improving human wellbeing. Comprehensive, high-resolution estimates are important to inform progress towards achieving this goal. We aimed to produce high-resolution geospatial estimates of access to drinking water and sanitation facilities. Methods We used a Bayesian geostatistical model and data from 600 sources across more than 88 low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to estimate access to drinking water and sanitation facilities on continuous continent-wide surfaces from 2000 to 2017, and aggregated results to policy-relevant administrative units. We estimated mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive subcategories of facilities for drinking water (piped water on or off premises, other improved facilities, unimproved, and surface water) and sanitation facilities (septic or sewer sanitation, other improved, unimproved, and open defecation) with use of ordinal regression. We also estimated the number of diarrhoeal deaths in children younger than 5 years attributed to unsafe facilities and estimated deaths that were averted by increased access to safe facilities in 2017, and analysed geographical inequality in access within LMICs. Findings Across LMICs, access to both piped water and improved water overall increased between 2000 and 2017, with progress varying spatially. For piped water, the safest water facility type, access increased from 40·0% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 39·4–40·7) to 50·3% (50·0–50·5), but was lowest in sub-Saharan Africa, where access to piped water was mostly concentrated in urban centres. Access to both sewer or septic sanitation and improved sanitation overall also increased across all LMICs during the study period. For sewer or septic sanitation, access was 46·3% (95% UI 46·1–46·5) in 2017, compared with 28·7% (28·5–29·0) in 2000. Although some units improved access to the safest drinking water or sanitation facilities since 2000, a large absolute number of people continued to not have access in several units with high access to such facilities (>80%) in 2017. More than 253 000 people did not have access to sewer or septic sanitation facilities in the city of Harare, Zimbabwe, despite 88·6% (95% UI 87·2–89·7) access overall. Many units were able to transition from the least safe facilities in 2000 to safe facilities by 2017; for units in which populations primarily practised open defecation in 2000, 686 (95% UI 664–711) of the 1830 (1797–1863) units transitioned to the use of improved sanitation. Geographical disparities in access to improved water across units decreased in 76·1% (95% UI 71·6–80·7) of countries from 2000 to 2017, and in 53·9% (50·6–59·6) of countries for access to improved sanitation, but remained evident subnationally in most countries in 2017. Interpreta...

Household water insecurity will complicate the ongoing COVID-19 response: Evidence from 29 sites in 23 low- and middle-income countries

“…As policymakers and program implementers scale-up the immediate distribution of emergency WASH supplies, we encourage deeper consideration of how these activities can be transitioned into targeted, sustainable, long-term WASH investments. High-resolution geospatial mapping of water and sanitation access, like those produced by the Local Burden of Disease WaSH Collaborators in 2020, can provide sub-national guidance on priority regions ( Deshpande et al, 2020 ). Although solutions should be tailored to local needs and constraints, it is clear that most communities will benefit from improvements in both water infrastructure and water governance, and also the way water managers distribute water and remain responsive to the needs of diverse users.…”

Successive epidemic waves of cholera in South Sudan between 2014 and 2017: a descriptive epidemiological study

“…Estimated water and sanitation indicators remain poor in South Sudan; only 36·7% of the population had access to improved water and 9·9% had access to improved sanitation in 2017. 2 South Sudan will probably continue to remain at risk of introductions of cholera from other countries in the region, which could then lead to large-scale spread. Broad use of oral cholera vaccine combined with local WASH interventions might provide a stopgap over the coming years to block transmission while much-needed investments in water and sanitation are made.…”

“…Universal access to water and sanitation would probably eliminate cholera transmission but is unlikely given the pace of progress and financial commitments. 2 …”

Subnational estimates of factors associated with under-five mortality in Kenya: a spatio-temporal analysis, 1993–2014

“…Finally, the modelling framework can be applied to update the subnational estimates and evaluate progress as new data sources becomes available such as the recently concluded population census in Kenya (2019). 55 108 We compared our estimates with previous estimates generated from similar and comparable studies that computed the prevalence of wasting, stunting and underweight, access to improved water sources, coverage of DPT3 (for the period 2000-2014) [125][126][127] and skilled birth attendance (SBA) (for the period 2014) 128 (online supplemental file 6). The estimates were highly correlated and generally with good concordance, identifying and ranking nearly all similar counties with the highest coverage (or lowest disease prevalence) and those with lowest coverage (or highest disease prevalence) (online supplemental file 6).…”